I don’t like smartphones. I use a dumbphone.

But this is a wonderful initiative.

  • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’ve read that it’s because fairphone has to pay a fee for each unlocked device, but it sounds a little weird so no idea if that’s real.

    but, it can be worked around if you don’t want to get logged. the system just wants a 200 OK response from the server, I think through HTTP (not S), so you can set up an MITM proxy or custom DNS and web server to always give this response without using their website. that’s what I did too.

    you can read more here: https://forum.fairphone.com/t/oem-unlock-input-verify-code/56231

    edit: and also here: https://forum.fairphone.com/t/unlocking-bootloader-offline/95573

    and the connection is actually HTTPS, but does not validate it against a globally trusted root certificate, so it can easily be served by a local server and a self signed cert

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve read that it’s because fairphone has to pay a fee for each unlocked device, but it sounds a little weird so no idea if that’s real.

      The posts seem to suggest that Google is charging them a fee in that case, but that would be a little surprising given Pixels have a no-fuss unlock, and Google permits third parties to redistribute its proprietary add-ons to Android free of charge for installation by end users.

      In any case, you’ve convinced me this probably isn’t Fairphone being evil, though some sort of public explanation would be nice.