The observable fact is that women have lost to a complete monster twice. People prefer Trump to a woman. I get Hillary a bit, but after Trumps first term, any warm body would do compared to this complete shit show.
Agreed that after Trump’s first term, any other warm body would be electable. That’s how Biden won. IMO if it had been a woman instead of Biden, she still would have won.
You’re begging the question. We are aware that they lost to Trump both times they ran a woman. I think that if they had ran a woman instead of Biden, and men instead of the women that ran, we’d’ve observed the same result.
how do you know that their being women is why they lost?
The observable fact is that women have lost to a complete monster twice. People prefer Trump to a woman. I get Hillary a bit, but after Trumps first term, any warm body would do compared to this complete shit show.
Agreed that after Trump’s first term, any other warm body would be electable. That’s how Biden won. IMO if it had been a woman instead of Biden, she still would have won.
It’s an observable fact. The Democrats have lost when they have ran a woman against a monster.
You’re begging the question. We are aware that they lost to Trump both times they ran a woman. I think that if they had ran a woman instead of Biden, and men instead of the women that ran, we’d’ve observed the same result.
Every time they ran a centrist woman against a monster. Biden only barely squeaked by.
you seem to have forgotten that they were plural. kamala and hillary. thanks for the tip about capitalization though, i’ll keep that in mind.
(respond and i’ll use proper grammar on my next 10 comments.)