• bob_lemon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      In all the examples listed in the response, the inviter must explicitly be the owner of the house:

      https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/65991/why-do-vampires-have-to-be-invited-in

      Although that just leaves us with the question about who is considered the owner. I’m a renter, so would that be me, or my landlord?

      Fun fact: In German, this boils down to which translation of “owner” is used. I’m the “Besitzer” of my apartment (I possess it), but not the “Eigentümer” (I cannot sell it).

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I think “occupant” or “resident” are both better choices over “owner” for how this conceptually works.

        If a family live in the house, then a child of the family could certainly invite a vampire in, despite the child not being the “owner”.

          • tiramichu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            I’d argue no, because they are not a resident. They are only a visitor.

            Resident (noun) 1. a person who lives somewhere permanently or on a long-term basis

            Occupant in a housing sense is pretty synonymous with Resident legally, but in a wider sense can also mean “anyone there at the time” - especially in non-housing contexts (e.g. the occupants of a vehicle). So for the sake of eliminating all ambiguity I’d strike out Occupant, and stick with Resident as the most appropriate term.

    • guy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Seems unlikely, or all vampires are just dumb. Just hypnotise a burglar and have them invite you in