KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24

when does the candidate become responsible for their own turnout

I used nicotine pouches for a year then cold turkeyed at day 365

it’s no law at all. it couldn’t have been proven, and it can’t be disproven either. it’s a tautology.

duverger is an undisprovable tautology. it is not a law

the libertarian party punches way above the greens. you’re simply wrong.

you speaking about it as though people who would vote for a conservative only have one issue: Conservative candidate. but it’s a whole platform, and it’s also diverse in its Interests

tell people that didn’t vote “you don’t vote, you don’t have a right to bitch”

I don’t believe in rights at all but I’ll say anything I like

game theory assumes rational actors. it does not determine human behavior

values voting is the solution. it’s plain as day that the reason party consolidation happens is strategic voting. a refusal to compromise preserves a diversity of parties.

I’m not a bad guy.

harm reduction has a specific meaning. voting is not harm reduction.

the video learned the wrong lesson. party consolidation is the result of strategic voting. values voting is the solution.

perfect

black pilled as fuck

those examples I could accept but I think a lot of people use imparted wisdom as “common knowledge” and we should drill down on any claim that is disputed.

you see that you just did, right? it’s tautological.

no. support your claims

a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence

This is the last time I’m going to bother explaining anything to a leftist.

is this binding?

can you make some memes for me?

it makes me feel better about voting for her. also I think it is funny