I actually robot-fed my kitten from day one, so they basically don’t associate me with food at all, just with cuddles and reprimands.
I actually robot-fed my kitten from day one, so they basically don’t associate me with food at all, just with cuddles and reprimands.
Thank God for double blind peer reviews, warts and all.
I remember playing with the little black and white marbles in the logo, or am I misremembering? I have tons of fond memories of the game.
Reminds me of a scene from Don’t Look Up
I see no indicators that this was AI. Lots of details, no inconsistency.
Reminds me of this work by Latour. It goes into the tremendous amount of oftentimes political labor that goes into the establishment of new scientific knowledge as paradigmatic:
This assumes that the aorta cannot be deformed by the school bus. Cooked penne can be destroyed by a six sided die.
Shota
And cats. They were a menace.
Huh? Wikipedia isn’t banned in Russia yet. Though I do expect them to take steps towards it.
Looks adorable!
Exactly, in honor of Jimmy Neutron.
What is this low grade garbage? GPT-4 Turbo is old, this is just an update of it. Happens from time to time. This one is supposed to be a bit better than previous interactions of GPT-4 Turbo.
Hmmm, I’m increasingly wary of FOSS software as well. It’s part of the system and can be bought up. Not sure about the alternatives to it, though. I guess highly technical people with lots of free time can just self-host and compile, but that’s a minority.
This reads like a breathless advertisement.
3.5 or GPT-4? I can run the latter if need be.
Considering how lucrative drama content is, to the point where people orchestrate drama, I guess a lot of people care.
In my field it’s often general journal policy, not an individual choice. It’s hit or miss, as it can be easy to guess who the reviewer or author is in a niche field. I personally don’t go out of my way to figure out the author’s affiliation, even if it can be trivial. Regarding self citations, those are usually obfuscated at the review stage. I’d say that a paper is easy to narrow down to a circle of scholars, but it might be the first paper of a research associate, a throwaway paper by a PI, or a paper that aims to engage those narrow specialists. So is a kind of smoke screen.