Dekkia

So it’s opt-out. Great

But the other stuff is copywritten as well most of the time.

Just because it’s free to look at doesn’t mean it’s free to download, modify or feed into an AI.

This is the definition of ethically sourced data from the Apertus website:

[…] the training corpus builds only on data which is publicly available.

So they still train on Websites, Blogs and Social Media. Ethical my ass.

Also if you want to learn you have to break your system.

OP wants to connect a Bluetooth keyboard and play games.

Messing around and breaking stuff in a well documented distro is great for learning, I agree. But that’s not what OP was asking about.

Counterpoint:

If kids where taught how to solve them properly we wouldn’t need to dumb down equasions.

Your argument is based on the assumtion that AI “thinks” in the same way humans do. Which it does not, since it doesn’t think at all.

And being called a tool to generate code is borderline insulting tbh.

The argument was about deterministic abstraction.

A bunch of devs can hardly be considered an abstraction layer imo.

My argument was that a C compiler is an abstraction tool that deterministically turns the description of a program (in the C language) into machine code. That way people don’t have to write machine code by hand.

Yes, but if you send the same promt to the same LLM n times, you’ll get n different versions of the same thing.

When compiling the same C code (for example) with the same compiler and the same settings n times, you’ll end up with n copies of exactly the same binary.

It’s basically like telling a junior dev to code something for you and then passing it off as your own work.

Would’t call that coding either.

As a german I’d rather have her back than continue having Friedrich Merz.

No change is better than change for the worse.

Of course I’d like it even more if we had someone willing to make changes while also caring about people.

I don’t know what to tell you other than that there’s probably something wrong with you.

640K ought to be enough for anybody.

While a lot of people die trough suicide, it’s not exactly good or helpful when an AI guides some of them trough the process and even encourages them to do it.

What are you talking about?

Proton logged the activists IPs. This has nothing to do with any encryption.

So the answer is yes, if your threat model involves the government.

I agree with you, but they should be clearly labeled as such.

But that’s exactly the point I’m trying to make.

Average people don’t install/use linux because of the tinkering (amongst other stuff). If that’s eliminated, it’s accessible to more people.

but the average person installing Linux wants to be able to tinker.

But that’s the issue, no? To really take users away from Windows and MacOS there needs to be a distro that works without tinkering.

Tech companies and preventable controversies: name a more iconic duo.

vast majority of Internet traffic across the world is unencrypted.

In 2023 between 80% and 95% of web traffic was encryted. Unencrypted web traffic is getting pretty rare.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/12/year-review-last-mile-encrypting-web