It’s not a problem. “Ghost gun” refers to any gun without a serial number, whether it was manufactured without one or simply scratched off. Even under that exceedingly broad definition, these unserialized firearms represent less than 0.1% of all guns in existence.

3D printers aren’t the only way to make a gun. Traditional tooling also works.

Manufacturing guns for personal use is completely legal in most US jurisdictions.

It’s already illegal to manufacture and distribute or sell guns without a license.

“Ghost guns” are a boogeyman invented to sell more surveillance.

Gosh, if only it were illegal to manufacture and sell weapons without a license, then we wouldn’t need all this.

Sloppy investigative work, really. Did they ever even stop to consider the possibility that the trailer simply just did that?

You gotta take the socks off. It’s a texture preference

lol get friend zoned cuck

I agree with you, brother

Bro, man, dude, big dawg, brother, brother man, big man, big guy, bruh, cuh, killer, kemosabe.

I suck at remembering names so I keep a long list

Exactly HOW building 7 fell isn’t really relevant when it’s well-documented that the building was fully evacuated and destroyed, despite being nowhere near ground zero. It’s also very suspicious as to how the fire even started in the first place.

It might be impossible to know the exact details of how every little thing went down. But, just because you can’t determine all that doesn’t mean the narrative we’ve all been given is completely correct.

The idea that Bin Laden operated alone, independently of US influence, and without anyone in the US knowing what he was planning, stinks to high hell.

A mess with an air pistol (or any pistol, for that matter) is only inevitable if you’re using it in a way you’re not supposed to.

That’s like saying a mess is inevitable with a kitchen knife or a baseball bat. The object isn’t dangerous unless someone is being dangerous with it.

Why focus on this one, hard-to-prove, mostly circumstantial piece of evidence when there are many, many more pieces of concrete, direct evidence that the owner of the WTC and all the wealthiest people in the US knew about the attacks and chose to profit from them?

He bought the building for a song (about $900 million) because it was full of asbestos and required to complete a multi-billion-dollar abatement process by 01/01/2002. Most agree such a project would have taken a minimum of one year to complete. No plans were ever made to begin the abatement and he got a $1.2 billion insurance payout after they were destroyed.

Also, building seven and the attacked section of the Pentagon held all the evidence and personnel investigating the biggest financial crimes of the 90s, like Enron and their ilk.

There’s also the HUGE number of extremely high-risk puts that were purchased against the involved airlines in the week leading up to the attack. Like, 900 times more than normal, none of them expiring after the 11th, all of them suddenly paying out nearly twice what they were bought for.

Here’s a fun video with more details and sources: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vOZToel_368

Ben Franklin owned seven slaves early in his life, but later got rid of them, became an outspoken critic of slavery, and worked toward its abolition.

Also, slavery or not, the point still stands. They wouldn’t recognize America today and would be horrified.

That’s half of it. The other half is realizing that some of those “shining moments” were actually worthless

One of. The biggest is the fact that no one even thinks about sugar or caffeine.

Oh, you think that solves the problem? Go play MGS4 or Death Stranding. Skip every cutscene, then come back and tell me what happened in the story.

As someone who loves Kojima games and has since MGS1, not wanting multiple hour-long cut scenes in an action game is a perfectly reasonable preference. Even diehard Kojima fans acknowledge he’s long-winded with his storytelling and his pacing is glacial; it’s practically part of his style at this point.

Kojima originally wanted to be a filmmaker. When he couldn’t break into the industry, he switched over to making video games.

He pitched it, it was approved, he started working on it.

Then he received pressure to make it multiplayer (presumably to add microtransactions). He refused, so the game was canceled.

Yes, that Kojima. The same Kojima who never sold you a microtransaction, weapon skin, season pass, or even a paid DLC. The same Kojima who never compromised his artistic vision for a payday, the same Kojima who never bowed to studio pressure to make his game “more accessible” or “more marketable”. The very same Kojima who had to be forcefully removed from his own studio before he’d allow Konami to have a say in his creative process; yes, him. That’s the Kojima you’re referring to.

So you’d rather live in a world without Metal Gear Solid, Zone of the Enders, or Death Stranding?

There’s no way Konami or Sony are going to let that fly. Should Kojima have died on the DRM hill on principal instead releasing his art to the world the way he did?

Ill tell you what he’s NOT going to: anything to improve anyone’s life but his own.