Why is your shaker crying? Terrible design.

How does it compare to matplotlib?

Huh, how to add that to raw files? Interesting.

Another OP with some pixelated shait.

While a DSLR and similar devices have a dynamic range of something like 14 and more bits at ISO 100, where you lose a whole lot when compressing to 8 bits of a JPG, raws from smartphones contain next to no additional information. Actually the JPG is usually better because of how well tuned the post processing is. Giving me better control over white balance while taking the picture is the only thing that is really missing.

Talk about diving people, what a prime example. What would you say if I name fashion as one of the primary female problems? Or having good pictures on Instagram?

No worries

Sorry is the absolute number is slightly off. I thought the round number made it clear that it was not supposed to be a precise estimate but a general “this is how irrelevant they are compared to normal loses”.

Today 8000 Tomorrow 7000 …6000 … etc.

… Why is it blurred if she is wearing a bra…?

So the picture is wrong then, the marked angle is top right (and the right angle, of course), the other angle is not marked, so adjacent and opposite are swapped.

How do you know which one is “opposite” and adjacent? They could literally be exactly the same but in any case they both touch the hypotenuse?

Oh now I see it, in the title! Yes indeed what is it with people doing that?

Who stops people from using them 6 years other than the people themselves?

What censorship? What TikTok?

Odd that GPT (and of course all the LLMs too) only got better so far…

What a frigging teaser!

What does osmosis have to do with anything?

Agree, not the best perspective.

No, it was just suddenly completely irrelevant. The answers of the first chat bot that supposedly “beat” it are a complete joke. And yes, I just wrote exactly the same with the goal getting moved, next it has to invent relativity or it’s not intelligent. Absurd.