No it won’t, unless someone is willing to spend the money.

All of Germany’s problems will become far worse if AfD gets to the levers of power… yet here we are.

In the end it’s the same fact-averse inanity we see with Trumpism.

“Harris as bad as Trump” is very nice copium tho for everyone who did not bother to vote and is now faced with the reality of Trump trashing everything they love.

taking away transportation choices for no real reason

Yes, absolutely no reasons to limit the most inefficient transportation choice, the one that contributes most to pollution, the one that mutilates and kills dozens of people per year, the one transportation choice that is most expensive one for cities and residents alike.

No.

We are where we are because a sizable portion of the population is in the habit of preferring the worst kind of propaganda over facts.

Any person with half a brain cell was able to see that Trump would be so much worse than Harris.

as per Wikipedia, that bird (cinclus cinclus) eats insects, not fish

Thats the part of war that echoes across generations

Depends a bit on your preferred flavor of racism, but Middle Eastern peoples have historically been categorized as “Caucasian” (a category that includes Europeans)

you’re right, my bad.

but – food security it’s certainly not the main driver behind political decisions anymore.

Animal agriculture still receives most EU farming subsidies, even though plant foods feed more people

no surprise here - feeding people has never been the primary purpose of EU agricultural policy

shower thought: even if we “solved” the AI alignment problem, we’d still have a potential 51% attack if someone at a megacorp robot factory decided for suicide by robot and issued a software update to that end

spoiler: there are no big climate moves in Germany. Not with this government.

do you honestly think the current owner will leave anything remotely golden for you to take?

The EU Commission said that DST is up to the member states, and deferred it to the European Council for a coordinated approach.

And thats where the initiative dies I guess.

bone is less heavy than stone, also you can see bone has different surface structure.

Source: asked an archaeologist who thinks that although some people she knows do lik the bone, it’s not necessary.

Love it.

Unidirectional air flow, whats the big d… oh.

Imagine your blood flow was not unidirectional. Not arteries and veins, just… vessels for both directions. You’d like – have to pump blood down into your extremities one heartbeat, and with the next one draw it back towards the heart. With the added malus that you only get partial replacement of blood, because you cant completely constrict your vessels.

You probably couldnt even leave your bed, let alone stand on two legs that way.

yeah the tiny drawback here is that it doesnt exist yet.

a thousand lanes wide, a thousand cars long. put a fence around it, a million cars gone.

they are running TikTok, and that is getting close to front page news… (but not nearly enough)