Why would a news outlet guess the motive? Sure we can guess, but they shouldn’t say anything they can’t source

Ok Sam, use your great wealth and platform to do something about it

Yeah it’s totally only an American thing 🙄

People online tell me that language is fluid and spelling is interpretive. Just let your reviewers know that if they mark anything!

Only way I can see it is if it was a historically republican seat, then it’s actually a net gain. Otherwise it’s just an average election win

But America dumbo!

Fairly put, but I was mostly addressing the “play up” line. It’s common, and those you.see complaining about it leave. I may have addressed it poorly.

Meh it’s not 2003, folks aren’t accepting of being called slurs for not winning a match, especially while ranked as a beginner.

You installed filthy windows on the pure deck?

Reminds me of the hail Mary alien

Their mods behave like Russian commissars. Their users go along with it.

So good. The blind justice punch line always got me

Same as the “I wanna keeel!”

So why add the reverse feature now? If a need was identified, the tools presented to enact it, why do it in the shittiest way?

Looks like the fuckboi had merge without review privledge

I don’t understand why it wouldn’t be reversed. Everyone on the internet is fake until proven otherwise

If the data is legitimate, the intelligent conclusion is “how is this group not getting their needs met, such that they choose trump?” “How can this group be understood, such that they can better thier lives without putting others in danger?”

It’s Facebook-brained to conclude “fucking Latino men…”

No one is suggesting that.

Show your chat logs. I call bullshit.

Calling people out as “fetish like” for identifying with…anything… is a bad look.

A person’s perception of themselves, their identity or self image isn’t for you to qualify as being good enough

Realign on how you choose to spend your time