• 2 Posts
  • 44 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle


  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldIt's Your Fault
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Recording Resident: This ain’t weird? Look at the neighborhood creepers. The neighborhood creepers.Yeah. Look at Buddy, he’s still creeping.

    Unknown Neighbor: Steve, Steve, Steve, Steve, Steve, Steve, Steve. No, no, no, Steve, Steve, Steve, Steve.

    RR: Huh?

    Geffrey Gardner: You know exactly what it is, man. You know it.

    RR: What the F do I know exactly what it is?

    GG: You’re recording me. You’re trying to race bait me. You know, I know you are.

    RR: I don’t want to race … Bro, I have no issue with no color.

    Steve Carega: He attack your wife?

    UN: That’s what I thought, man.

    RR: Come on now.

    SC: You calling his wife a liar? What’s up buddy, you want something? You need something? How’d you get here, bro? You walk all the way back, past all the cattle, you walk back here? Come on. You walk to go through a gated community? Whatchu want?

    RR: You think I would do all that to hang out with you? Come on, now. Come on, now.

    SC: Buddy, you’re crossing the line now, bro.

    RR: Hey, you’ve been crossing the line, acting like you gonna hit me.

    UN: Yeah, we all know that.

    SC: We know that, bro. We know what you want, buddy. We know!

    RR: Bruh. They creepers! They following me.








  • It sets both the technical requirements and recommended best practices for determining the validity of methods used to authenticate digital identities online. Organizations that interact with the federal government online are required to be in compliance

    My argument is that if this document (and others) are requirements for companies shouldn’t there also be a more approachable document for people to use?

    Sure, have the jargon filled document that those in the know can access, but without an additional not so jargon-y document you’ve just added a barrier to change. Maybe just an abstract of the rule changes on the front page without the jargon?

    I don’t know, maybe it’s not a big deal to compliance officers but just seems to me (someone that isn’t a compliance officer) that obfuscating the required changes behind jargon and acronyms is going to slow adoption of the changes.


  • The one that gets me is that if the Universe is infinite but how matter can organize itself is finite (albeit a very large number) then there is another galaxy just like ours, another Earth just like ours, and there is another GoofSchmoofer writing this exact some thing in the exact same way somewhere out there.

    And if this is true then how many GoofSchmoofer’s are there in this infinite Universe?



  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldCities these days
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s crazy to me is this is a well known problem yet the people that have the ability to legislate this have just 100% ignored it.

    The presidential candidates in the US either completely ignore it (trump) or give a solution of building 3 million new homes (Harris). No one wants to actually start regulating the number of homes that an individual or company can own. It’s an obvious solution to the problem yet, complete silence from the law makers.