It’s obvious you were waiting for someone to finally say abortion so you could respond with that.
If women are dying because of laws denying them medical care that could have easily saved their lives, that is the definition of not protecting women.
How come Syria has to protect women, but US federal and state governments don’t?
This is a Satisfactory lizzard doggo. I’m sure of it.
Finally say it. The rando that’s been there for 20 min, “what?”
Gym Crush: Is anyone using this?
Me: No, and the machine is available too.
At the rate we’re going, it’s always too soon.
It’s hard to perceive your “what do you mean?” as genuine, especially considering it wasn’t a vague reference. I think you could have asked, “Do you only mean abortion or is there something else?” and communicated your points in a less passive-aggressive “trap” framework.
Additionally, the original point only stated US governments are not protecting women, which is true regardless of your stance on abortion, regardless of the intended target of the law and regardless if it was intentionally targeting, “a war on”, women.