If you vote for a fascist, you’re a fascist.
If you vote for a fascist, you’re a fascist.
Sounds like that would work for same sex marriage, personal pronoun use and transitioning between genders too.
We could call it the “mind your own fucking business” bill or something equally catchy…
Apparently it’s literally in the standardised tests… that’s what’s causing the problems! 😉
You can’t eat the brain.
Shouldn’t
Is that Young Kevin Sorbo?
Because it’s not made of cobalt…
It would almost be funny if not for the whole “fate of American democracy” thing.
Sure, the Democrats are Doctor Evil and his minions. But the Republicans are literally Hitler and the nazis.
Vote accordingly.
Because they think they’re helping stand on other people’s necks, and that’s just fine in their book.
Then they act all surprised with the “I never thought the leopards would eat my face!” when it happens.
The last time I tried to install Windows 11 on a VM (Nutanix AHV), I had to fiddle with a virtual TPM and lost the live migration feature as a result.
Dos this mean I can install the LTSC version, not need the TPM and have a working, live migrate-able machine?
Something to test next week…
You’re a transphobe and an asshole. Got it.
You’ve had your shower thoughts, everyone is telling you why you’re wrong. At best your ideas are from the last century. At worst you’re just a troll. We can’t make you get with the times or summon the smallest amount of empathy for other people, but we can shun you for your offensive attitudes.
Again, you’re basing all of this on your opinion of what a woman is.
And you’re wrong. It’s as simple as that.
Why? Because it makes you feel better?
I think they know themselves and what they need better than you do.
Why can’t they just be happy being a male and just wear feminine clothes?
My god, you’re a genius. No trans person has ever tried “just being happy” with how they are. They put themselves through the misery and surgery and social stigmatisation, when all they had to do was “be happy”.
I bet you could solve depression too, if you put your mind to it.
Counterpoint - if people don’t need to take crappy jobs just to afford food and shelter, those jobs will have to provide better pay and conditions to get employees.
Also, if more people can afford to get further education, you’ll get more doctors and engineers and high skilled workers, because they’ll be able to do the training instead of getting several minimum wage jobs just to support their families.
I’ve said it before - any society that can afford billionaires can afford to feed, clothe, shelter and provide basic medical care to all is members, it’s just choosing not to.
Reminder that on an iPhone, if you hold the Volume Up and Power buttons simultaneously for several seconds, the phone will vibrate and will require the PIN or password next time you unlock it, not Face/TouchID. This happens whether the screen is on or off, so you can discretely do it in your pocket.
America, no!
What?
Sorry, force of habit
I’m in this picture and I don’t like it
It’s like… I want to disagree with you, but you’re making me think.
Why are we ok with having required services that are only provided by third party companies?
They’re not specific - No government says you must have a Facebook or Twitter account. But you’re right - you have to have a bank account and you’ll not get far in 2024 without email.
What about a step further? If you want a phone number, you need a landline or mobile. Both of those are only provided by private companies too…
While I don’t disagree with you in principle, I do find it a bit funny that you’ve picked one of the easiest services to change between as your hill.
There’s no reason you _ have_ to use Gmail, or Hotmail. There are a billion email providers and if you have enough technical knowledge, you can even run your own (I really don’t recommend this though, it’s harder then it seems to do it safely and securely).
If you pick a provider outside the US, your government can’t do dick about getting it shut down, and if you pick one in a particularly privacy-conscious country, you can have everything encrypted to the point where the provider themselves can’t read your messages.
Also, I assume this is similar in the States, but I’ve seen government IT projects in the UK and some of them are truly awful. I wouldn’t necessarily trust them to look after important emails for me. Plus a single source of email would be an awfully tempting target for hacker groups around the world.
“I didn’t think the leopards world eat my face”, cried person who voted for the Leopards Eating Faces Party