So it takes a flood to consider Poland central Europe

Because some mice have a secondary scroll wheel, or the scroll wheel can tilt to scroll sideways

People like to procrastinate

They’ve been launching cyber attacks at USA for years. Are they not at war yet?

Hostile design right there

Are you using the default shade of green, or did you enable higher contrast setting in accessibility? I hear it helps with readability.

Lol, the ios users will still be subjected to the eye-fucking shade of green when chatting with android users. Apple sure loves to mess with their users.

What do you mean that the search engines contain minimal amount of site’s data? Obviously it needs to index all contents to make it searchable. If you search for keywords within an article, you can find the article, therefore all of it needs to be indexed.

Indexing is nothing more than “presenting data to the algorithm” so it’d be against the law to index a site under your proposed legislation.

Wrong. The infringement is in obtaining the data and presenting it to the AI model during the training process. It makes no difference that the original work is not retained in the model’s weights afterwards.

This is an interesting take, I’d be inclined to agree, but you’re still facing the problem of how to distinguish training AI from indexing for search purposes. I’m afraid you can’t have it both ways.

What would be achieved by peace talks? Putin will dig deeper into the lands they occupy and get more time to rebuild their army and strike even harder. It’s been proven that he can’t be trusted.

I’d be careful with the “always” part. There was a famous case involving Katy Perry where a single chord was sued over as copyright infringement. The case was thrown out on appeal, but I do not doubt that some pretty wild cases have been upheld as copyright violations (see “patent troll”).

Are you really trying to argue against a point by providing evidence supporting it?

What do you think “ingesting” means if not learning?

Bear in mind that training AI does not involve copying content into its database, so copyright is not an issue. AI is simply predicting the next token /word based on statistics.

You can train AI in a book and it will give you information from the book - information is not copyrightable. You can read a book a talk about its contents on TV - not illegal if you’re a human, should it be illegal if you’re a machine?

There may be moral issues on training on someone’s hard gathered knowledge, but there is no legislature against it. Reading books and using that knowledge to provide information is legal. If you try to outlaw Automating this process by computers, there will be side effects such as search engines will no longer be able to index data.

You can. Airport regulations have no bearing on fiction, and the movie does not need to be set in present time either.

Maybe 4 weeks in a row?

Yeah ive seen this happen. After €15k grant was introduced, all house prices went up by that much. At least 1st time buyers are at an advantage in this case, over those who already have a home.

Because they need help the most. Once they can move out if rental accommodation, the demand for rentals will fall and so will property prices, and everyone will benefit (maybe except landlords).

To be fair it’s not hypocritical to use service you’re entitled to and still be against it. After all, you paid for it with your taxes.

Without it I was screwed

Yeah, and then I left.

Last I checked they had none left…

This meme format always annoys me because of the double negative. If “nobody” says nothing, then surely everyone says something.

Having said that, my native language uses double negative, for example “nobody said nothing” does mean that nobody said anything, but for some reason in the way the meme presents it and English language, it does not work for me.