Removed by mod
Removed by mod
That’s lame AF.
In an enlightened society, each man or woman would govern himself or herself.
And from what I’ve seen in my lifetime and in the history of the world it’s almost unavoidable.
To quote you: “You will not just make things like jealousy, violent tendencies, the need to be controlled, and people fearing those different from them magically disappear.”
Please point to the words ‘violent mental illness’ in your original post. Now take your yellow highlighter pen and color it on your screen. Actually, use a Sharpie - what the hell. Maybe next time you’ll see it and remember not to speak out of turn.
If you mean to say that ‘violent tendencies’ is necessarily equivalent to ‘violent mental illness’, I would counter that they are two different things. I would say that people in the armed forces have violent tendencies. Police officers have violent tendencies. But violent mental illness is a completely different thing. Violent mental illness implies that the violence is not a rational response to the situation at hand.
So, sorry I took away your little 'Gotcha!" moment.
You should read more and type less.
Sounds a lot like the USSR, were they not PatSocs?
Does anybody else find it interesting that the name Nazi referred to national socialists? Now apply that to this discussion.
Please stop talking about there being “a political compass” for crying out loud!
Education?
Well, I mean, we are capital in a sense…
However, revolution is a form of democracy. Direct action by the People.
Similarly, when I learned the error of my ways and decide to join the American socialist party, I learned that they were just a bunch of trans-fascists using the name and popularity of Socialism. This is a new world folks, nothing is as it appears.
Yes everybody wants a democratic system until that democratic system picks the guy/gal that you don’t like. Then the mail-in ballots come out.
deleted by creator
Knowingly voting for a fascist. That’s interesting. You’re different.
Love it! 😅😅
Look, people have been debating the definition of socialism for decades, and you guys are not going to figure out here today on Lemmy World.
In order not to be confounded with economic socialists, who the right accuses of wanting everything for free at the expense of others, I always inform people that I am a Nathan J. Robinson socialist.
Dude, it’s your ball. Take it and go if you’re upset.