

In the sense that klipper does everything through configuration files: yes.


In the sense that klipper does everything through configuration files: yes.


only a tiny part of Christians are pedophiles
I’m pretty sure Christians are pedo at the same rate as the population at large. The issue there (apart from them being pedophilic) is that the Catholic Church has a tendency to protect them - forgive and forget, and all that.


wrong no mater what culture you speak of.
Well, their culture is clearly OK with it. It shouldn’t, but it is.


To get started: Install NixOS, grab your /etc/nix/configuration.nix, and /etc/nix/hardware-configuration.nix (from the top of my head) and throw them in a git repo. nix-shell -p <application> if you quickly need a shell with a specific (temporary) program, like git (just for bootstrapping; add git to the configuration.nix if you wish to keep it.
Start with that, and slowly keep adding programs, configuration. If you eventually wish to add a second computer to the one configuration (so you can start reusing configuration), do that. Keep steps small.
Here you can dig through each step I take in my nixcfg - I started with just the configuration.nix, and share that between machines, but it turns out you’re supposed to add the hardware-conguration.nix to the repo as well, so then I started to do that (with still a shared configuration.nix. Well, partially:
Read nixstory.md if you want to see a quick LLM-generated history of how my repo changed over time (based on my git history).


This is precisely why I use NixOS. I have almost my entire configuration as “code” (data structures more like, but what’s the difference any way?), such that when I break something, I can just undo my commits and go back to a working version (and the OS itself retrains several snapshots, so I can always pick the previous one.
And with LLMs the bar to do things, with my nix configuration (nixcfg), has lowered to the ground. Throw in a few videos from Vimjoyer and you got a stew going.


I mean, I’ve never done it until just now. Turns out it works just fine. What’s your point?


Does that mean we only had Democracy when Trans Rights were introduced?
Like, if the removal is the end of democracy, then is the opposite also true?


God loves unconditionally*
* some conditions apply


Yes, PLEASE self-segregate yourself!


“Calling women fake gamers, larpers, attention-seekers, or outsiders for visibly enjoying games is gatekeeping. It turns a hobby into a status boundary and makes gaming spaces worse.”
That’s the point I got from GPT-5.5.
I disagree with the conclusion - I don’t think gate-keeping is bad. I used to think it wasn’t, but I see a lack of gate-keeping spaces, on both a local and national level, as the cause of certain issues. Go create your own damn hobbies with sparkle-ponies and hot-Antonio-Banderas lookalikes. Just leave mine alone.


There are sex differences in social behaviour, and gaming has historically been a male-coded status space. So when women enter that space, especially visibly, some men interpret it through suspicion: attention-seeking, trend-following, or identity performance.


and naturally they tend to be male dominated because people keep gatekeeping and being misogynistic for no reason.
Why does every male-dominated space need to become inclusive? Why does the same not happen with female-dominated spaces? Why does this only happen in one direction?


You Europeans give Americans so much shit;
If you don’t like that, then stop being complete embarrassments
We can say whatever the hell we want.
Do you? Maybe your government won’t publically make you STFU, but plenty of Americans have died under suspicious circumstances. And if not the government there are plenty of NGOs (Non-Governmental Organization) that’ll fuck up your life, if they can.


I was thinking along the line of them yoinking the guac right from under your nose, even if you weren’t finished yet.


Always has been - most people (me likely included) will just who whatever is cheaper.


“You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics,”
If you only measure the workers, sure. What if you measure the processes that have been automated by programmers?
I’ve automated a semi-manual (first run this script, then that one, and then…) process. Would that process show up on their measurements? I bet it won’t.


Get that woman Firefox, so you can install ToXCancel for her, so you can stop giving yourself an aneurysm.


Punk is genre P LGBTQ+ are viewers V Queercore is subgenre Q
I said:
P accepts V V creates Q If P accepts/includes V why V create separate Q?
TV viewers are V Cooking show is P Cooking show subgenre is Q
You said:
V accepts P then why did V create Q
How should your response make sense to what I’ve said, logically speaking?
Just go ask an LLM first (ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini/Mistral/yourselfhostedllm). If it doesn’t know, then come ask here.