Osa-Eris-Xero512

While its nice when a program let’s you pick the egress interface for its network traffic, split tunneling is still on the host os for handling its route table and making sure that’s set up correctly. Like, were people setting up split tunnel networks where they were treating the vpn interface as a proxy, pointing the software at it, and just hoping for the best?

split tunneling is not 100% secure

This keeps being said and I don’t understand why people keep saying it. Split tunneling should be exactly as secure as your route table makes it, shouldn’t it?

They were half a letter off. We were so close to perfection

This is why I wish those micropayment systems took off. I would be happy to pay 20 bucks a month for ‘ad free’ browsing if most of it actually supported the creators of the content i’m accessing.

10x their cpm is still fractions of a cent for me as a user on a per page view basis, there’s space for winning here if one of the big tech ad companies gets behind it and pushes.

Yeah, neither team is playing well tonight, but the chiefs have just been off form all game except the 4th quarter.

Not just Northern Ireland, if Scotland and Wales fucked off with a unifed Ireland to form Great Ireland without the English.

Imagine the English malding

Death of the author only applies if she’s dead.

So unless there’s been some good news in the last day, those people are just coping

These do seem to be pretty reasonable arguments.

This timeline is wild

2 issues there: the food and fuel for those cities move through the traitor parts of the state. Supply lines will be a major issue in the early weeks of any major event. In addition to that, those blue cities aren’t homogeneous just like their states aren’t, so there will be further subdivision past the metro line.

But what about climate wars

I’ve seen the payment processor argument a lot about this regarding twitch specifically, but I really don’t think it holds any weight in this one specific case. This is Amazon we are talking about. They are one of the 3 entities in the whole goddamn world who could dictate terms to Visa, not the other way around.

Fellas, is it petty to refuse to support Nazis?

In a similar vein i would add Unsighted to this list.

It’s a well documented fact that only people who live outside of cities count as people.

Yeah, CC doesn’t cover it in any case. Any attempt would probably need some sort of bespoke license to specifically target the training use case while still allowing comments to be used like normal.

And a Microsoft-sized pile of money to fight it out in court.

I think a lot of the concern here, for me if noone else, is them taking the data and then turning it around into a closed for-sale product. If AI is going to be trained, it should be trained well, but if the result of doing so is them turning around and charging [me/us/everyone, as applicable] an ass load for the privilege of its use then I want no part of it.

AI trained on public data should be public. So if adding boilerplate is the solution to this problem, let it be infectious licensing which forces opening of the resultant model to the public.

Wouldn’t scotus ruling one way or the other, due to this being 14A, also automatically apply to the other states?

I think there might be something to be said here for some potential selection bias. Are Tesla drivers like ram drivers, overly aggressive idiots but with the added layer of being relatively new tech?