



I was just thinking that one table might get a bit old, that’s great! Reminds me of the Neverputt game. Always loved those.
This looks really fun.
I remember what it’s like to share accommodation too.


“A lot of men and their behaviors have ruined this product.”
That’s men acting as they intended using a product as intended. There is no plot twist here.
That does seem like a very effective ad.
And for people with physical disabilities it can mean a better breakfast than would normally be possible.


I hadn’t heard about that but yes, you’re right. I think that kind of thing is vulgar.
She has stood up for vulnerable people many times, too. Most artists look the other way and count their money.


She keeps popping up in the news for great reasons.
Came here to say this. Let Amazon provide the search and reviews. We can use that but spend our money elsewhere.
At the most basic level could get the store name via the current Amazon page and then open a new tab with a search.
But ideally it would actually provide a like to their own web store. Not sure how that part would work technically.


I find it bizarre that nations would celebrate US events anyway. The original people of the land are still treated brutally there: treaties remain broken, stolen land has not been returned. You might as well celebrate the Nakba but uninvite Israel.


Too many cookie toggles for me to stay, but I thought I saw some interesting looking icons.


That’s a good point. I’ve been voting for a party for years that started on 2-3% electoral preference. The general consensus at the time was that it would be nice to see them grow, but they’re a wasted vote. They’re now around 10-11% and even as opposition have impact.
We don’t have FPTP where I am, but I can see from our neighbours the kinds of problems it creates. Still, once you progress beyond FPTP, the kinds of attitude problems we have here still persist. I guess you’ll have a better idea of the next steps once you have proportional representation, because then you have a better idea of the government people really want.


I would also argue that few people have made a very good case connecting peoples concerns to capitalism. So to many it has a Southpark-ish ring to it: capitalism is bad. Don’t do capitalism. It’s an abstract thing, and abstract opponents make people feel despair and impotence.
The most persuasive people I’ve seen don’t use that word often. They directly link peoples concerns to inequality (unfair taxation and employment laws), climate ( fossil fuel companies) and unregulated abusive businesses such as big tech.
Those are not faceless, abstract entities, so people can organise their (justified) anger better.
Has anybody else heard good approaches for helping people understand ?


Rape - kill - steal - repeat

Another Zionist state joining. Great. More genocide washing.


Another benefit of the biggest offenders becoming transparent as well as liable, is that it can show smaller countries how we can follow the same pattern. It is difficult to explain to people why we should hold ourselves accountable when they point at Britain, Germany, Israel, etc and see no accountability. Best of luck (in the most genuine sense of the phrase).
My theory is we prefer to treat obedient and servile objects as people, and actual people as unavoidable collateral.


Even better. If you ever make it to the West of Ireland let me know.