I honestly think the bare minimum respect for your mother should demand you to be for Abortion rights. Your mother risked so many different kinds of pain for so many different kinds of reasons, at the very least, you shouldn’t want to make other mothers having to risk their life for just trying to have a baby, when all it takes is a bit of a cruel fate.

That is a good point while honestly I can’t think of a vague group like “others” without thinking of including my e.g. mom and also a random person from who knows where. We are brothers and sisters. And I don’t understand how i could have learn anything else from Jesus’ teachings and I am now a non believer.

It speaks to their confidence. Your lack of confidence is why you aren’t a top assassin.

“I do kneel” is a wild abbreviation for antifa.

They usually don’t do it professionally.

As i understand it and what is interesting to me, is that they f… A programmer, not programmers and that exclusively and professionally.

A professional programmer f… wow that is a job?

Honestly i add $10 to the pot. Please, get them talking!

Ofc but dutch is the language of the “deutsch” land anyway. So i don’t understand what you are trying to tell me /s

That is not a dutch flag. That us a luxembourgish flag lol

The whole argumentation fails apart if you ask yourself a simple question, is the meme transformative to the art that it is using. As you already stated, “in a way the creator never foresaw” highly implies a transformative nature.

But isn’t ai art transformative? Oh it might be. But well, the company making the ai, stole art to create the model. There is no transformative step between the art piece and the version of the art piece that they use to train the ai. It is stolen art but not because the model steals, but because the model is built on stolen art. Everything that an ai model can produce is based in stolen art. So any similarities are not a little reference to some other art piece but stolen art. As the whole model is based on similarities, it produces exclusively content that has similarities to that stolen art. And if everything is a reference to stolen art, the ai art become effectively stolen art.

But what about people and their faces? Yeah i don’t think you should use/make those memes, unless the people are public figures. But not because it is stolen art, as the memes tend to be transformative, but because everyone has a right to privacy.

I am serious!

I know the name kid rock. I don’t know a single song of his, like I don’t know that it is his at least. And while I have seen his face recently, I couldn’t tell you who that people in the meme was without the label.

I seriously don’t know that guy at all. I am not denying his legend title to be mean or rude to him. I just think I would know a music legend.

I am not advocating for it but in other nations, that would cause a military coup.

Master was just always a bad name for it.

You ain’t seen nothin yet! Go and study 1930s Germany

Totally not directed to me but the reader.

Even to a reader, it is incredibly arrogant in tone.

I don’t know why you have to be a dick in your response to me but I will return the favor in my response.

Well maybe you shouldn’t assume someone doesn’t know the history because you don’t understand what they mean.

Some quick steps to understand subtext:

1. As it is obvious that a website can be used for anything, the description of wild is not actually describing the act.
2. If it is not describing the act, what is it describing? Clearly it is describing an ability. The ability of whom? As the “what” is already excluded as an option. The government’s abilit to do that!
3. Obviously the government can do that though… so maybe the ability is not the ability to do it but the lack of consequences that one has to face when doing it.
4. consequences? From whom? The public.

So let’s read it again, “it is wild that the public let the government publish obviously partisan propaganda over public channels like that”.

But why would the author expect the public to show a reaction to this behaviour? Mhm maybe because he is aware of the history and he assumes that the general public has the vague understanding, due to history, that the government shouldn’t be used to push partisan propaganda.

But please, be proud of how smart you are and how you know history while failing to understand the subtext of a simple sentence.

That a government site can be used so obviously for partisan propaganda is wild.

KPIs and goodhart’s law ❤️

Such an enlightened belief.

“People believe what they believe” wow

Sadly true. But in Europe, things don’t only move towards the shitters. Which gives me hope.

Anyway, europe might have to look into the French playbook.