Why does this tax exists? For taxing ads? Like for promoting a clothes brand?

Yes because never ever an user had abused their OS.

Newsflash honey: it’s a fucking tool, it doesn’t have feelings. It’s your own choice to use it or not.

Man fuck these half baked parasocial analogies.

One thing doesn’t exclude the other.

There is no alternate universes.

20 years ago we also thought piracy was dying. Yet here we are.

It’s not hard when you take the first step to admit that a habit is bad and you need to get rid of it. Even if your subconscious tells you not to.

Yeah talked like a kid who haven’t give up anything yet. That shit takes time and I got places to be.

tl;dw: You have a brain for a reason. Use it.

To read? Or to achieve conclusions without reading? Please use it before answering. Fucking moron.

Bro have you ever tried to get rid of a habit? It’s fucking hard.

You missed entirely OP’s point of sticking to things familiar and gradually adapting. Is faster to learn this way.

They found weapons of mass destruction

Impossible Mission Force

But then again, Gen. Laura Richardson, SOUTHCOM commander, is a military officer,not a diplomat or humanitarian program lead at USAID.

Classic military man woman. For them, we are the enemy, the southern continent, the population occupying their backyard. Gringos culiaos.

These people should NEVER talk publicly about these things.

This is a “they are hoarding all the profits” “they’re not open to stock exchange” “why I can’t have a piece if this cake, it’s unfair” kind of news.

Pure pressure politics.

He’s teaching Spanish right now.

To his defense, what you describe was pretty much the rule back then before the 1700, for “nobles” I mean.

And Im telling you that is practically impossible to read your mind without committing other known already existing crimes. There is a rule already for it, it’s called basic human rights.

When I say sci fi law, it’s because it’s fiction. This new law is against fiction. Your example is for something that’s not fiction. Do you understand the difference? Do you think this politician forwarding this law understands it?

This is more akin to those old laws of banning all alcohol.

Want your privacy? Should force/convince your countries to ban cameras first*.

Lots of misconceptions here. Brain waves are just the communication between neurons. This is basically internal wiring, everyone is wired differently. Also nothing gets out of your brain on its own, except heat.

A tool like this can only measure regular patterns between humans and compare them. You will only get are interpretations of your brain status. It can’t read your memories nor know if you’re thinking about eating a burger. At most it will get a “you’re hungry” alert. You can train it to be better at figuring you out (or to do other stuff, like controlling a robot), but you won’t get more without a very invasive direct link to your brain (and more training). Which is more like torture at this point.

This new law is just promoting fear for something they don’t even know if it’s possible or not. Very sci fi law.

ITT: ignorant people with 20+ years old knowledge.

Nuclear energy has been safe for a long time. Radioactive waste disposal is better than ever now.

Bro, they have remapping keybind in their game, I don’t know what you’re on about.

So which one really is it

• dropping it for backlash
• too expensive to be done
• actually implementing it but keeping it shush for PR

Well Discord now is more than an app for voice chat, it’s a social network on its own, with its own trackers and privacy issues (without mentioning ads). Difference is discord I not asking companies to pay for their API.

This seems like a Twitter integration kind of thing