The true thought dilemmas of human nature. Is something only a shower thought or was enough thinking involved to consider it mildly interesting.

I miss those nature shows. They are way more interesting than they sound on paper. Thanks for reminding me of those and solving my analysis paralysis.

This is what I was thinking. Most people probably just come together algorithmically or by having played a round together, and not necessarily by search. If there is the need to search for a specific player, there is also often a second player ID that can be used instead of the display name.

How is it that there is always a fitting xkcd no matter what kind of hilarious situation is mentioned?

Oh, so that is how those headphones work. I had an MRI a long time ago as a child, and really can’t remember much about it at all.

Was it really the headphones being low quality or is the MRI just so loud that any headphones would sound terrible?

I thought the reason that Nintendo was always able to win these copyright accusations was due to Japan’s strict copyright laws. But if I read correctly, this was fought over in a US court, or am I misunderstanding something?

And this is why double negatives are in general frowned upon in the English language, because they make the content much more difficult to understand.

You had me in the last sentence… sadly

I’m not sure if I understand completely correctly what white label websites are, but also maybe the themes made for the Hugo website building program?

Sad, but also kind of funny that the true original apparently survived. I guess this means it will just be rebuilt again?

Personally, I do not think that there is a purpose in speaking well about it. That being said I would also not speak badly about it. My own moral compass would be speak badly about the conpanies that deserve to be gotten rid of and simply use the companies that provide decent services. No need to praise a company for offering a decent service.

Although it would probably be fitting to describe it as a subset. If you look at vision, then it is a spectrum that includes everyone. Even blind people. If you are looking at blindness, then it is a subset of the vision spectrum that only includes people that meet certain other criteria, i.e. below a certain threshold of vision. Same for autism disorder. Every human is on a mentality spectrum, and autism is a subset of that.

cheap for a human to complete but expensive for a computer to beat

This is the reason and logic. There are no advanced algorithms deciding your “humanness.”