

You thought that because the headline is pretty deliberately misleading. Clickbait trash.


You thought that because the headline is pretty deliberately misleading. Clickbait trash.


The article is clear the broken update effects a specific subset of enterprise users, on a specific mix of base versions and cumulative updates.
So you admit the headline is lying, then? The headline doesn’t even try to use weasel words to say “some users”, it just straight-up says that the update removes things, heavily implying both that it’s a global change, and that it’s deliberate.


I feel like people have completely forgotten that Kamala was at like 3% when she bowed out of the primaries.


you just get loans against your static wealth at incredibly favorable interest rates.
It’s more than that, because the wealth of those who utilize loans this way typically isn’t static. It’s not about just getting a good rate, it’s that the assets they use as collateral appreciate in value at a rate higher than inflation and the interest rate combined, so in practice, the interest rate is literally negative. The price of having access to these loans is that their net worth just grows a bit more slowly as a result.
Of course, this only works as long as said assets continue to appreciate at that rate.


This would be funnier if it wasn’t so aggravatingly accurate, lol.


That headline works whether or not that C is capitalized, heh…


There’s a large gap between disliking and wishing for death, lol
Am I the only one who always subconsciously mentally replaces “baby” in song titles/lyrics with “infant” to see how funny the result is?
power wasting lights.
To be fair, it’s all LEDs now, which consume very little power.
As someone who needs to actually feel peaceful while I have 45-60 minute threesomes in the shower during the week, I’m all set.


That’s not the number of people using Amazon, that’s the number of people paying for a premium subscription service on top of their Amazon usage. No one, whether they buy things on Amazon or not, needs Prime.
That is the point they’re making.


No, it doesn’t. My comment was nothing more than a grammatical correction, that “opinion” is not what you call an unsupported assertion/claim; that’s not what the word means.
I was not engaged in the underlying argument, at all, yet your response is a sputtering, indignant tirade about how I’m shifting the burden of proof, etc.
Read more carefully.


Pay more attention to who you’re replying to. Your comment makes zero sense directed at me.


No evidence of your claims and thus it is your opinion
Nerd time, but:
That’s not how it works. Opinions are subjective by definition. An assertion without evidence is not an “opinion”.
Yeah, that’s not definitely not on YouTube, the final ‘star score’ was effectively indicative only of the ratio of the 5-stars to the 1-stars. The infinitesimal minority that would actually thoughtfully rate 2, 3, or 4 stars made no difference at all.


Is there another more ‘generic’ German term that would fit when talking about this period of time in retrospect? So you could have one line that says the German equivalent of ‘he was the leader in Germany during this time period, commonly referred to by the title Fuhrer’, and then no need to keep using “Fuhrer” anymore in the rest of the article.


If your concerns are ethical, then you should be consuming only indie music from unsigned artists
…who could be using AI, lol.
The doctor would likely mention that it would apply to masturbation also, lol
I remember the joke that Microsoft called it that deliberately so that if people wrote “I hate ME” it wouldn’t sound like they were trashing the OS.