• 0 Posts
  • 332 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 11th, 2023

help-circle





  • While I appreciate data, nothing I see at a glance is very supportive of an incumbent potus dropping out being a good idea. I dont have much time to dig into it right now, but of the two incumbents they highlight in the article, both were VPs that assumed the office after an assassination, and in both elections, the incumbent party lost the white house. Neither are particularly similar to the situation in 2024, nor do they suggest that pulling the incumbent would be a good idea.


  • Harris’ takeover has been an an absolute success, but anyone claiming they knew it’d work out this way is lying or delusional. Just because we hit the low percentage chance that it all worked out doesn’t mean people were wrong for thinking it was most likely a bad idea because all available history and information basically assured that it was.

    That said, anyone that got vitriolic about it (on either side, tbf) can get bent. This is all uncharted waters right now. Being a dick about it either way isn’t helping anything. Let’s not pretend to know that anything is certain.










  • The game is rendered at a lower resolution, this saves a lot of resources.

    Then dedicated AI cores or even special AI scaler chips get used to upscale the image back to the requested resolution.

    I get that much. Or at least, I get that’s the intention.

    This is a fixed cost and can be done with little power since the components are designed to do this task.

    This us the part I struggle to believe/understand. I’m roughly aware of how resource intensive upscaling is on locally hosted models. The necessary tech/resources to do that to 4k+ in real time (120+ fps) seems at least equivalent, if not more expensive, to just rendering it that way in the first place. Are these “scaler chips” really that much more advanced/efficient?

    Further questions aside, I appreciate the explanation. Thanks!