It’s not what we want, it’s whats happening.

Normal stable countries don’t have states that float the idea of stopping funding to the federal government, consider suspending habeas corpus to make arresting people easier, and deport non-whites en masse to concentration camps.

Sticking your head in the sand and complying in advance doesn’t work because it assumes governments have a conscience that will learn from mistakes and guilt. It even considers this is a mistake. This is entirely on purpose.

If conflict escalates with an armed vigilante uprising, it will be used by Trump to justify everything the military does, which will include live rounds on civilian targets. An armed militia cannot compete with the military.

News flash, the peaceful, non-violent protest were already justification for Trump using the National Guard and Marines.

It’s arm ourselves now or be disarmed when they mutilate the bodies of those they destroy.

I’m calling it, it won’t come out. I just doubt it will happen.

If it does, it’s a rebranded phone wrapped in fake gold leaf, like the Pablo Escobar phone. https://www.pcmag.com/news/the-phone-from-pablo-escobars-brother-is-just-a-galaxy-fold-covered-in

Nah, I pay about $25 a month for unlimited talk, text, and 35 GB of high speed data before being dropped from priority. It helps its a MVNO, which is the term for companies that use the networks and infrastructure of the big 3 cellular telecomms without needing to physically maintain them.

British children! Maybe a few Prussians too.

Asking ChatGPT to play chess is like asking someone who’s not played Chess to play well, and then documenting how poorly it played. Like no shit the hammer did a bad job as a saw. You wanted it cut, you should have used the tool for the job.

ChatGPT isn’t Deep Blue. It’s not made for that. You’re asking a word processor to calculate pi.

They won’t. They can’t even blame the person who’s job it is to be a popular candidate with polices that interest the voting public to win.

States’ rights to abuse its citizens, no states’ rights to protect any of them.

Taking bets this gets the ire of the DNC because “the good billionaires” should be allowed to tip the scales, like 2016, 2020, 2024.

“Look one democrat in this local level race is a good person, so the party is absolved of the fact they vote yes on Trump’s policies.”

So the DNC is going to support them in doing this, right?

Somehow that was removed for Rule 3, I don’t see how.

No.

As we all know, private corporations don’t charge whatever they want, and don’t jack up the prices because of a “Fuck you, why not?” fee and bill.

People saying “yes there’s proof” but aren’t giving any. Weird…

Congress has always had this power. I’m personally for nationalizing telecomm companies.

A few years ago they announced they were no longer going to bother with getting all the FAA approvals needed for their rockets because it took too long. Space-x still got government contracts.

How long back was that? I genuinely didn’t hear about that, but I believe that would happen. I tried googling “space x faa” but I’m getting results of FAA investigating rocket issues and approvals of rocket models.

Gotta love how liberals have decided to call “I want less murder” now accelerationism.

They just parrot whatever some commenter said without ever checking what words mean.

Oh that’s awesome. I hope it can still be accepted by the IRS for the future (if we still have one in ~3 years) but it would be neat to just be able to have an open standard for online filing.