Disclaimer: I support pigouvian taxes on greenhouse gas emissions.

Long ago, one libertarian solution to climate change was insurance. So you’d buy disaster insurance for your house, then the insurer would bet that pollution would go up. This creates a financial incentive to reduce emissions. Best case scenario, your insurance payments are a slight reimbursement for a voluntary reduction. Worst case scenario, your insurance payments essentially bribe their workers to sabotage.

However, the Coase Theorem says this only works while transaction costs are low. And you’d need long-term contracts that aren’t realistic with today’s interest rates. So it would take decades to establish the financial infrastructure necessary.

mostly

They’d treat you the same way they treat people who throw back the gas canisters.

There isn’t. The only hell they’ll ever see is the one we create.

How is that definition useful? The USA and Israel both torture and have plenty of laws.

Why not both? We can automate the trains (more), the busses, and the occasional rural drive.

We should use assassination markets to pay their own men to kill them.

Because they “didn’t vote for that”. They voted for lesser evil, which includes bombing Yemen for a decade. The spoiler effect is obvious to fellow voters, but incomprehensively arcane to lawyers.

The cheapest way is free: volunteer to be an organ donor!

I was imagining more like an angry mob.

If they aren’t, then it’s best to turn them away at the Greenlandic airport for maximum inconvenience.

Rights are protected by a democracy, but fought for by a resistance. I hope you’re right about which one of those we’re at.

we shouldn’t be in a situation where billionaires

Which, you’d think, would get any sane person to find a better website.

They’re saying the opposite

Now = since Red Scare

Whoah there buddy, we’re supposed to tolerate the sickness until they go on a shooting spree.

Then it wasn’t tried

Reptiles?