Even if there is, though, that would only affect you and the messages you read. If you sent it to others, they could still do what they wanted with it.
Even if there is, though, that would only affect you and the messages you read. If you sent it to others, they could still do what they wanted with it.
Low barrier to entry if you’re not counting visibility. Yeah you can publish to the stores, but nobody will see it unless you are ordained by the gods at Apple and Google, or you buy eyeballs (and have the capital to do so.)
There’s no way to prevent someone from retaining data once they have it. The clients would have to voluntarily cooperate.
I agree and don’t use it. But that’s not an ethics question.
I pick a different one every time. Keep em guessing
Poorly phrased in the article if I understand correctly. It means it gave a correct positive diagnosis in patients who had already been diagnosed, with those percentages.
I dunno why people gloat when someone dies of old age after a long life. That’s pretty much the best any of us can hope for.
If there were justice Kissinger would be dissolved in napalm.