What if they work for a PMC? I’d probably judge that. Or worse, what if they’re a CEO?

I don’t know honestly. Really, with AI it would be pretty difficult to be foolproof. I’m thinking of the MIT card counting group and how they played as archetypal players to obscure their activities. You could easily make an account that upvoted content in a way that looked plausible. I’m sure there are many real humans that upvote stories positive to one political party and downvote a different political party. Edit: I mean fuck, if you wanted to, you could create an instance just to train your model. Edit 2: For that matter, you could create an instance to bypass any screening for botters…

It also took one person to start the whole couch fucking thing.

If there were, upbotters would use it to verify that new bottling methods weren’t detectable. There’s a reason why reddit has so much obfuscation around voting and bans.

Is it possible to get a report of which posts are being voted by them?

Wow, it’s probably a one in a million chance that you replied that to someone who knows the reference.

This is ancient.

Haven’t played it so I have no opinion on its quality, but that came out a decade ago.

The fact that this comment is getting upvoted is why I fucking hate this place.

But there is no public debate commission, and no public funding going to these debates. It’s two campaigns making a deal with a private TV network to show them on TV arguing with each other. Should there be a public debate commission? And if there were, would it be appropriate to feature more candidates? Maybe! But as is, the only real issue is that the vast majority of the public does not care about these candidates.

The debate is literally an agreement between Donald trump and kamala Harris. There is no neutral debate commission involved. This doesn’t really make sense.

Those candidates are free to have their own debate if they think they can convince someone to put them on TV.

Edit: Also is Jill Stein a “moderate”?

Lots of good games out there. If you’re playing, say, shitty ubisoft games, that’s on you.

Major “defining your personality by your choice of phone” energy on this one.

Right? No justification is required.

I know little about Romanian law, but due process generally means cases like this move very slowly.

LOL, yeah, manufacturers don’t follow this at all.

Most of my lunches are leftovers, but many of them are things like a burger or a bratwurst that I can cook with little effort. Or I can buy something.

Imagine complaining about £4 for lunch, I’m lucky if I get out for under $20.

Oh I think I recall a reference to that on Mad Men. Before my time though, and I’m in my 40s.

That is, of course, only a problem with outdoor cats and feral populations. Indoor cats are fine. Personally I keep my cat indoors for a bunch of reasons, but I also think that reasonable human beings can feel otherwise. I’ve noticed that there are a lot of people online who have decided that not only is keeping an outdoor cat bad, it’s a form of animal abuse. And therefore they not only berate people who allow their cat outside, they also encourage people who stumble upon outdoor cats to take possession of them since they’re being abused. This is a pretty extremist position that probably doesn’t reflect the views of most cat owners, but it tends to get magnified in cat communities that rely on upvotes, since upvotes encourage echo chambers.

There’s a metaphor here.

Investors don’t invest based on the quality of games they put out, they invest on how much profit they make.