Which is when Trump gets in office. They could probably manage if they have a guarantee from him that they’ll restart deliveries. It might just delay the genociding a smidge.

Even if they stop now, Trump will just restart it after inauguration. They should’ve done it a year ago.

You mean by hanging out with Liz Cheney and talking about a ‘lethal military’?

Do you support all peoples claiming their homelands again through ethnic cleansing, no matter how much time has passed?

They should’ve arrested all of them and held them until they could work out which ones are war criminals that can be referred to the Hague.

There’s a huge range of policies that poll in the 80-90% range that neither party wants to touch because they upset the donor class.

If democracy doesn’t work for the majority of people, and your party runs on ‘rescuing’ that same democracy while at the same time villinaising the people that do want to improve the people’s economic conditions, you’re not going to be winning elections.

If you want to rescue democracy, you need to show that democracy can work for people, it’s the same mistake Weimar Germany made.

So, when you’re running, ostensibly to save democracy, you should probably offer those voters stuff that will turn them out. In 2020 Biden promised them a $2000 check, and that worked (even though he reneged on it afterwards).

The only ones to blame are the Democrats. Trump got less votes than in 2020, so it’s not like he got more popular, the Democrats failed to get their base out. You can’t even blame the Greens this time.

Yep, any country bombing UNESCO heritage sites is engaging in genocide.

Guess what, not everyone thinks that, and a good politician would actually promise to improve people’s lives instead of continually talking about how bad the other guy is.

Trotting out the least popular Republicans ever as being on your side didn’t help either.

In a functional democracy, the candidates would run on things people want. Instead, both parties cater to what the elites want.

The difference between Republicans and Democrats is whether they pay lip service to these policies or not (then Democrats find a way to not pass whatever that policy is, whether it’s with a rotating villain, the parliamentarian, keeping the filibuster, etc).

It’s a joke about how you can’t quote Wikipedia directly in papers, etc.

Allow them to work and they can fund their stay anywhere. Anyway, like like all that’s moot now, Trump is going to be going with the government accommodation model.

So Nazis are allowed to just do whatever, but they’ll set up an undercover operation to catch anyone fighting them.

Unfortunately they can’t quote Wikipedia directly in their work, but they can use the sources in the article.

There’s no telling who would’ve won a competitive primary, but the process would’ve allowed the eventual winner to distance themselves from Biden on the right things, have a program that would’ve actually appealed to voters, and picked their own team to run the campaign, and there would be buy-in from the Democratic base, instead of feeling like Harris was imposed on them.

I don’t think she’s a bad candidate, but she made the mistake of listening to the wrong people that told her to run to the right and cosy up to millionaires, instead of building on the work Biden had done with unions and anti-trust, which was reasonably good for a neoliberal Democrat.

People were happy she’s at least coherent, but she didn’t exactly impress when she ran in the 2020 primaries, in fact, there were some stories after the fact about how badly that campaign was run.

These people are really angry about winning.

From doing dishes and stuff like that.

Like, why the fuck are they still inviting their football teams to play?