I meant the milk, but ok. farmers agree: calves are the farmers property as much as the cows are

babies don’t make milk. other animals don’t have property. You’re just anthropomorphizing.

just saying it doesn’t make it so. it’s perfectly natural to drink milk, and plenty of people aren’t lactose intolerant.

many naturally aren’t.

no, they didnt

It’s YOUR fault no matter how you twist reality.

the only people to blame for Trump’s presidency are the people that voted for him and funded him. like Hilary Clinton.

what did contrapoints do?

obama ran on the famous deportation mantra si se puedes, and ran out of bombs killing brown people. just because you’re concerned about one facet, doesn’t make it less fascist

absurd ideological basis (anarchy supporters)

I am not a community but can you please add me to your list

They allowed racist, misogynistic fascism to take firm root, good luck weeding it out now.

was that in the progressive era, when eugenics and fascism were the rage? the usa is fascist, and has been for all of living memory. blue-colored or red-colored isn’t less fascism.

you’re the one who can’t seem to count.

it is functionally equivalent to voting for the candidate furthest away from that non-voter’s preference.

no, it’s not.

where’s the money, Lebowski

so you know non votes don’t get counted for Trump

Removed by mod

id argue those incentive programs are, themselves, eugenics policies, but I also think ending them is complicated, as doing so in one jurisdiction and not in others is, you see, eugenics.

trump only gets to count votes for him. any other vote is a vote against him, and a non vote is a non vote

whatever metrics you use to decide who gets to procreate, you will certainly bias the gene pool. That’s eugenics

your semantic understanding of eugenics doors not seem to understand why people opposed eugenics and eugenics policies.

if you didn’t vote you voted

the mental gymnastics inside one clause are incredible