I hope this is not true
Ich mag Pflanzen und hab ein extra Regal dafür. Support your FOSS (Free and OpenSource Software) projects!🫶🏼
I hope this is not true
But they run locally on the phone, if I’m not completely mistaken. So no use for a server.
Or do they offer this option? I think they explicitly advertise no internet access.
It’s funny how my brain makes the cat look huge whenever I focus on the CAT logo.
As it probably has internalized the size of things with this logo
You can’t just compare creative writing to writing a paper.
He could’ve just said “I have a turing award, you don’t” if he wanted to show off.
He is also called one of the godfathers of deep learning, so I’d say his contributions are very significant.
He means the photic sneeze reflex.
If they post it on a non-google platform, they only gonna reach people that already don’t use Google…
Not sure of you’re trolling or not…
Why downvote him? He made an observation and comments even explained why. I learned something, it added to the discussion.
The toolbar padding looks weird (top padding too low) and the toolbar key size is too small as well. But all in all totally usable alternative.
And OMG I love the glide typing it just works 🫠
I agree. Especially as the app is already 20 MB in size… 1.5MB wouldn’t make much difference IMO.
Speaks to the fact that we apparently need better and new alternatives or make current tools easier to use.
Certain aspects of discord seem to resonate with people (unfortunately…).
Man pages are great as mentioned, but maybe not as accessible to some people. Are there tools to generate more convenient resources (e.g. wikis) from that? Similar to how generating technical documentations from (structured) code comments.
I think this is more a case of the triangle inequality in metric spaces, as you don’t have to calculate any particular edge to see the shortcut, as well as that it applies to any even non-rectangular triangle.
Just use a VPN bro and you’re fine /s
Hello, as I said, it’s about “security by design”, which means to design a system that ‘doesn’t allow for insecure things’ in the first place. Like a microwave oven doesn’t operate when the door is open. IT-/cyber-security is a complex field, but 2FA is a good place to start, regarding user facing services. There are lots more things than that of course.
That’s exactly right. I was about to say how people usually don’t even “not take it seriously” but rather don’t even think or know about it. But you already said that yourself haha :D
The lions share IMHO is at 23&me. Offering such a poorly secured service is negligence, in the face of the data’s high sensitivity nature.
I use it for explaining stuff when studying for uni and I do it like this: If I don’t understand e.g. a definition, I ask an LLM to explain it, read the original definition again and see if it makes sense.
This is an informal approach, but if the definition is sufficiently complex, false answers are unlikely to lead to an understanding. Not impossible ofc, so always be wary.
For context: I’m studying computer science, so lots of math and theoretical computer science.