Ⓐ☮☭
I am mostly speaking about when referring to your kids while speaking to other adults.
Case on point, you just told the public internet you are the parent of multiple kids of the male sex. Why should anyone here need that personal information?
Kids also discover genders pretty early in life. They will have an initial preference.
I would not mind if we collectively decided to just use gender neutral terms when referring to kids till they are old enough to express a preference.
It would actually even be a benefit for “saving the kids” the less personal details strangers can know the better.
90 posts in 4 hours. Hot damn.
I saw a gif about some cool hyprland dotfiles and i fell in love.
Instructions said it was designed for arch.
There are many more other reasons i stayed. Its great to actually feel in charge of my system.
Debian/ubuntu has its uses in server reliability but its missing snap for daily use.
Fedora is to close to corporate for my personal interest.
The most twisted part of this is how fucked up do you need to be to make an absolute monster call you evil beyond belief.
Just general command key for shortcuts?
It is probably my most pressed button because of this, also i changed the keycap to eye of horus.
There is some nuance to what exactly is banned.
I self host a vpn at my home that i use to connect to my home network on the go. This is a super common use-case and also cant be used to circumvent regional blocks.
Work also uses a vpn to securely tunnel company hardware to our servers.
A blanket ban on vpn software and technology would be ridiculously dumb. Almost as bad as blanket ban on encryption.
If they make exceptions and only ban vpn with intention to hide and circumvent the law, then you only need some legal excuse if someone comes asking and its more a morality guideline then a criminal law.
If they blanket ban “vpn technology” i would simply suggest ignoring it. Laws that stupid are too incompetent to take seriously. I recon its completely unenforceable.
Either way you’re unlikely to be investigated unless the government already has a reason to investigate you. In which case you’re probably fucked no matter how secure your internet.
I feel like the use of “AI” was just clickbait here.
It doesn’t provide us any details beyond it will be based on performance of similar schools in the region.
They wouldn’t try ask this to chatgpt would they?
Would they?!
I am well aware, the first sentence of the person you replied to is a direct responds to the article, the context was not far off.
But sorry if my reply bothered you, my reply was just as much intended for the random scroller/reader and nothing personal.
Um… You are aware you made your comment about ai being much more then just llm within context of a discussion on wether the ai bubble will burst or not?
Cause that’s what this post/thread is about.
The ai bubble will burst nonetheless. I was also playing on the “sir, this is a Wendy’s” meme. In a way joking that your comment is actually not relevant to the discussion.
Once the ai bubble breaks for llms it will drag general machine learning down with it once panic sets in. People wil dump any stock that even faintly smells like ai.
Some actually valuable business may disappear, on the other hand those that survive and are undervalued may actually be a good investment opportunities.
This is not financial advice, to gamble your money is dumb.
Sir, this is the stock market.
People order with their feelings, not facts.
I have called out numerous articles for being ai written myself.
This one however reads very human and does not have the obvious tells of ai.
It also uses and describes coherent pictures from the actual research.
The “wormhole, multiple realities” thing is hyperbolic, the researchers even directly state that that is not really what is going on but the analogy might help people grasp what is actually going on.
I have been interested into “nano composite/meta materials”for a while, personally labeling it the most important technological breakthrough to date.
What this research has found was theoretically expected, it significantly lifts me up to read we managed to demonstrate it in our lifetime.
The handful of decent cops in the uk and europe: “Am i joke to you?”
Obviously they still have plenty of incorporated rot but some countries actually train police to de-escalate and are held to standards.
It also helps that gun violence is exceedingly rare when guns are regulated well. Having to fire a bullet can be a legal a nightmare for a cop because of the paperwork and immediate investigation into wether it was appropriate for them to do so.
Thats a super weird question but yes there is someone named Ariana i encountered online this year who I would not be surprised to be a Linux user.
We know, this is not an attack on em dashes.
It’s still ai slop.
I use em dashes all the time myself, I also make this critique and people always respond with a defence of em dashes.
Its the use patterns on how and when they are used combined with other patterns that makes it evident that it is AI. Its just the most easily recognisable tell. When you see over use of em dashes in a an article online, you check for those other tells.
Depends what you consider the baseline to call something “coding”
Plenty of kids dabble with Redstone in Minecraft, there is also stuff like this:
Q: Why support Israel if jews hate christians?
A: Leveraging alliances for U.S. benefit, (fake) peace in Gaza makes us look good. Theological differences don’t prevent collaboration on shared interests.
Why bad answer: Failed to adres the antisemitism
Article does not deserve a click, fascists be fascists. The person who asked the question is the broken clock showing the right time by asking a good question for still wrong reasons and got a default calculated answer.
Then not what I said,
Neither do you as a private citizen qualify to be held to a higher standard like the real world examples I gave.
You’re not being pushed towards anything by me. Normalising safe practices is not the same as making it required law
I am merely pointing out that in most contexts people don’t require that information and the less information about your kids is out there the safer they are.
I know that gender has been made political, but it shouldn’t be. Frankly its dumb that people care so much for something that is rarely relevant outside the bedroom.