Someone made a post about how they thought they could fight a bear, describing exactly the scenario in the image.
Someone made a post about how they thought they could fight a bear, describing exactly the scenario in the image.
I remember when this reddit post came out, it was as wild as that imaginary bear. Forgive my reminiscence, but I think I made a comment like “dude shut up I wanna see him do it” to someone saying that he shouldn’t, and it got several upvotes. A dozen, even. It was nice
I’ve been pronouncing it all-e-glucky
Manipulativeness
“Hey, I was wondering if you could help me figure something out. I was really flattered by your invite the other day, but I’m not interested in dating right now. I enjoy your friendship and I don’t want to jeopardize it. Is there a way we can comfortably set boundaries without ruining that?”
IMO this way you let them know you’re interested in maintaining a relationship but at a friendship level. You demonstrate that you care about their feelings while clearly establishing the need for specific boundaries.
Also, “Pierre” also means “rock” in french, so his name could be translated to “Stone Wolf Clawed”
I feel like it would be one of those high AC/low damage roll fights
It’s the same combination on my luggage!
Ah, the art of bushit-o
<the lore/gameplay/soundtrack/story were great/instant classic>
wait, we’re bringing Riley memes back?
I just use P155w0rd as my password. No one guesses it
That’s because the deal has already been sealed. They typically wanna keep you off the market, not increase your “resale” value. Unless you’re into that kinda thing. Like, cucking or sharing kinda kinks, not human trafficking. Human trafficking isn’t sexy. Unless you’re into that kind of thing. Like, as a fantasy, not as a real thing. Real human trafficking isn’t sexy. Unless you’re into that kinda thing. Like, as in humans stuck in traffic or transforming into cars and being stuck in traffic, not as being sold as a commodity. Unless you’re into that kind of thing.
Things do get looser as you get older
create rule: from microsoft teams -> trash
From the last time I saw this, what I understood was, the lawyer isn’t asking the witness if there’s a possibility the person in question was alive, the lawyer is trying to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person in question was not only undeniably dead, but also impossible for the person to be alive.
Source: my memory from a random comment on the internet, pay it forward
Not to generalize, but cannibals often talk with a mouth full, or an ear full, or a toe full…
Go back into shower, resume task