• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh no! You are going to make your platform work like ass? And you expect us to do mental gymnastics in such a way that instead of blaming you (you know the one that has control over the platform) we blame uBlock? The same uBlock that has made using your platform bearable for many years, to the point that I will sit in silence with the screen off instead of watch with ads?

    I think even if you make us wait a min before playing the video most would take that over an ad.

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That’s what they’re banking on, but we know that eventually they will f*** it up and lose everyone.

        • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Unless we have some serious alternatives, that won’t happen anytime soon

          Video hosting is really expensive. Every service running for free will eventually enshitify and turn out similar, because there’s no such thing as free massive servers

          • brisk@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Peertube has already delivered the sustainable model: creators host their own videos and viewers assist distribution.

            • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              All they need that I see is missing, is a way to discover / search everyone from any instance. Like, a consolidated / federated search.

            • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Who pays for the servers? Because if even big platforms like Signal sometimes struggle to pay the bills, in part because they spend a lot on their servers, then it’ll be dozens of times worse with video hosting

              • brisk@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                53 minutes ago

                Content creators. It’s hard to host everyone’s videos, and it benefits monopolists to imply that doing so is necessary, as it prevents new entrants. It’s not nearly as hard to host your own server (or pay for it to be hosted). It becomes harder when you suddenly become popular, a situation which Peertube explicitly compensates for by sharing the distribution effort between viewers, which scales with popularity.

                Signal makes it’s own bed like YouTube by being a single centralised server for everyone. Nobody ever asks “who pays for the servers” when it comes to Matrix or XMPP

          • Rin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            It is… they’ve out spent the competition. Now that no one else is around, they’re trying to make all the money they can. Luckily, it won’t be long before some other alternative will pop up anyway.