fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agoCursedmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1external-linkCursedmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squareLoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoCan someone explain to me in layman’s terms why this is the most efficient way?
minus-squareDevadander@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoAny other configurations results in a larger enclosed square. This is the most optimal way to pack 17 squares that we’ve found
Can someone explain to me in layman’s terms why this is the most efficient way?
Any other configurations results in a larger enclosed square. This is the most optimal way to pack 17 squares that we’ve found
Source?
Bidwell, J. (1997)