• CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    No. It’s clearly not the same logic. I have no problem with anyone’s body shape. If an actress were to act out the role of a child in an adult film, then I would have a problem. Since you want to take it there, then I’ll point out that you are using the same logic as the people who claim certain art is not pedophilic because the child’s body is canonically inhabited by a thousand year old soul. Is that context readily apparent? Is that context entirely relevant? I would argue it is not.

    • tsugu@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is that context readily apparent

      Yes.

      Visible human emotions, walks on two legs, exhibits clear intelligence (talks, reasons, makes jokes, etc.)

      They are called anthropomorphic for a reason. Nobody wants to fuck a real wolf.