Pro@programming.dev to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoAnother Tea memeprogramming.devexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down118
arrow-up1101arrow-down1external-linkAnother Tea memeprogramming.devPro@programming.dev to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squareFizz@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months ago4chan wouldnt be it. Maybe breachfourms om the darkweb. Then you can go on the clear web and pretend to be a random user who happened to see the post and then post that somewhere.
minus-squareSprocketfree@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoWhy? Nothing the user that accessed this did was illegal. Like here’s an open s3 bucket… Can’t prosecute me for that.
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoSecurity through obscurity has unfortunately been a successful argument in the past.
minus-squarebrandon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 months agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz for a specific example. While he committed suicide before it was resolved it does show the kind of hammer that can be brought down from accessing public info
4chan wouldnt be it. Maybe breachfourms om the darkweb.
Then you can go on the clear web and pretend to be a random user who happened to see the post and then post that somewhere.
Why? Nothing the user that accessed this did was illegal. Like here’s an open s3 bucket… Can’t prosecute me for that.
Security through obscurity has unfortunately been a successful argument in the past.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz for a specific example. While he committed suicide before it was resolved it does show the kind of hammer that can be brought down from accessing public info