• brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Only have to interpolate then!

    Thanks for that. Wouldn’t have checked myself this time, so appreciate it.

    Out of curiosity…

    Would you personally keep the ban? (No one wants dead kids, but we do want kids to e.g. ride bikes even though at scale bicycle fatalities are essentially inevitable, making it an honest question I hope.)

    “What did it cost” they say

    • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Well, UK Parliament did discuss the matter and concluded that because the choking was a result of playing with a toy with small parts, not to do with the fact that it was in an egg originally, that a ban would naturally extend to any toy with small parts.

      None of the kids accidentally ingested the toys while eating the eggs - if you’ve ever had one you’ll know why that would be impossible.

      So I’d get rid of the ban. That law was not put in place to stop Kinder Surprise Eggs - it’s an unforeseen side effect of a law that was genuinely intended to protect people when it was written.