• Jtotheb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’re (mushrooms) also constantly listed on American menus as a “protein” option despite a dire lack of the stuff

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hmm, is it really that little? The stats look devastating, like e.g. 3 grams per 100 grams, but mushrooms also consist out of 90+ grams of water.

      For example, the button mushroom has:
      100 g total - 91.8 g water - 1.7 g fiber = 6.5g nutrients
      2.89 g protein / 6.5 g nutrients = 44.4% protein

      Comparing that to e.g. canned black beans:
      100 g total - 70.8 g water - 6.69 g fiber = 22.51 g nutrients
      6.91 g protein / 22.51 g nutrients = 30.9% protein

      • ftbd@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes but you don’t dehydrate the food. And you’re not eating multiple kgs of mushrooms in a single sitting, which you would need to get anywhere close to the total amount of protein in other ‘protein’ options

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes but you don’t dehydrate the food

          You kinda do unless you eat then raw. Cooking removes water content.

          Cooked beef has 26-35 grams of protein per 100g. Uncooked like 20, and beef doesn’t contain as much water as mushrooms do.

          I’d say it’s acceptable to have them in the high protein part, as macro-wise, they are.