• DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    As programmer. It’s helping my productivity. And look I am SDET in theory I will be the first to go, and I tried to make an agent doing most of my job, but it always things to correct.

    But programming requires a lot of boilerplate code, using an agent to make boilerplate files so I can correct and adjust is speeding up a lot what I do.

    I don’t think I can replaced so far, but my team is not looking to expand the team right now because we are doing more work.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Same here. I love it when Windsurf corrects nested syntax that’s always a pain, or when I need it to refactor six similar functions into one, or write trivial tests and basic regex. It’s so incredibly handy when it works right.

      Sadly other times it cheats and does the lazy thing. Like when I ask it to write me an object, but chooses to derive it from the one I’m trying to rework. That’s when I ask it to move and I do it myself.

      • hue2hri19@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        AI is not needed for any of the points you mentioned. That’s just intellisense and auto complete with extra pollution and fossil fuels

        Good luck when you need to link tests with requirements and you don’t know what the tests are doing

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          My point is precisely that it’s a glorified autocomplete. And who says I don’t know what trivial tests do? They’re trivial, repetitive, and my time is more precious. But you got a point about fossil fuels. Tbh, I don’t even drive, travel, eat red meat, or have kids. That’s almost my entire carbon footprint right there, and in comparison with everyone else, I’m doing ok.

          But I will say that you’re like the fourth person this week who not only fails to understand what I wrote, but also doesn’t bother to ask clarifying questions before attacking, and then assumes things about something I never said. You literally don’t need to be hostile when disagreeing with anyone.

          • hue2hri19@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes your point completely went above my head. Sorry for that.

            Hey, not attacking or being hostile really (at least on purpose), sorry if it came that way. It was more of. Tongue in cheek type of comment