• Bilb!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    I had been using Aurora-dx, but I also like to play games, so I re-based to Bazzite-dx when it became available.

  • Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 minutes ago

    Call me a Luddite, but I want to retain control over my updates and upgrades. I fear the day that Fedora becomes all atomic, all the time, which I can’t help but think is in the cards

  • todotoro@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I am a container evangelist, I find excuses to convert my jobs into Kubernetes workloads, and I frequently use the likes of podman for one off apps/processes and development. I use Flatpak frequently to isolate dependencies for the likes of Steam and Heroic.

    I really wanted to like Bazzite or Bluefin, but I can’t deal with the overhead from the rpm os-tree updates. I would frequently notice hitches for my use case (sunshine streaming), and the hoops I had to do to configure Nvidia drivers (for it to then not work as good as other distros) was tiresome.

    I went back to Arch (EndeavourOS), and I improved sunshine performance and had a driver that worked with less fiddling.

    I’m saying all this because, while I’m glad to see any Linux distro grow, I hope it starts delivering what it says on the tin eventually without compromises that I experienced. Markering on it being immutable and container focused is true, but I dont see the benefit (aside from more stability which as others pointed out, is already stable is most cases)?. Right now, its a simple to configure (assuming most defaults work for your setup) distro that is finding a growing niche amongst some users (obviously by the data shown). And thats good enough for now at least.

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The removal of KDE Discover has me considering going back to plain Kinoite on my HTPC. I figure I can build a sysext with the handful of bazzite bits I actually use and keep the unbutchered plasma experience

  • dyinoffmuha@lemmy.cif.su
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Never really understood the appeal of “immutable” distros.

    There’s not a single distro out there that does everything right and won’t require manually editing some fuckup on the developers’ part. Why would we want to make it harder for us when the time inevitably arises?

    spoiler

    I’m just assuming it’s because people are stupid and like to fit in with other idiots. The average computer user today definitely has difficulty thinking for themselves and making their own decisions, so whenever someone else comes along and tells them a different way of doing things, they immediately assume that person is right.

    • skilltheamps@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Go on and keep using your distro another few years, and you’ll recognize the patterns of what keeps breaking. And then try some others for some years, and you’ll find that you can at most pick between smaller issues on a regular base on rolling ones, or larger batches of issues on release based ones. And some point you’ll find that every user creating a custom mix of packages that are all interdependent on another is quite the mess, and the number of package combinations times the number of configuration option combinations is so large that you can guarantee some of them will have issues. On top you have package managers rumaging around in the system while it is in use, and with a mix of old code that is still loaded in ram and new code on disk behaviour for these transients is basically undefinded. Ultimately you’ll grow tired of this scheme at some point, and then running a byte-to-byte copy of something that has been tested and doing atomic updates is quite attractive. And putting a stronger focus on containerized applications not only enables immutable distros for broad adoption in the first place, but also cuts down the combinatorial complexity of the OS. And lastly, to be honest, after so many years of the same kinds of issues over and over again, the advent of immutable+atomic distros + containerized desktop apps brought a couple of new challenges that are more interesting for the time being…

  • brownmustardminion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Lots of shit-talking Bazzite…

    I don’t game much but when I do it’s on Fedora.

    What distro do you all recommend for my Windows buddy looking to switch to gaming on Linux?

    • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Bazzite is the option for Windows converts that want a gaming focused Linux desktop. A lot of people are going to nitpick it to death, because they want “Literally Windows but without Microsoft”. Which isn’t happening while Linux has the market share it has. You either accept a few annoyances (while advocating for those annoyances to be fixed), or go back to Windows and accept Microsoft’s authoritarian control of your computer.

      Bazzite is a solid desktop that’s going to be really hard for a regular user to break, comes with Steam, Lutris, and Heroic built in, proprietary nvidia drivers installed, and is based on Fedora (Modern, stable, well supported).

      The only downside is KDE can be really easy to break if you’re a new user unfamiliar with how customizing it works, but if you leave it default you’re fine.

        • dyinoffmuha@lemmy.cif.su
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Nice automated response. Pretty sure that hasn’t been an issue for years.

          Linux Mint’s website was hacked and they served a malicious ISO, but the useful idiot crowd never talks about that.

          The snowball effect is real, and if you can’t see it then you’re probably a part of it.

          The main reason why people hate on Manjaro is because it makes it easy to use a historically complicated distro. Anyone rational person who has been in the free software ecosystem for a substantial period of time will recognize that there are many morons, elitists, and losers who like to make things more complicated than they need to be to feel superior to others.

          Also, people don’t like when another distro is better than theirs, which Manjaro is for the vast majority of rational users.

          • pineapple@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            33 minutes ago

            No one hates endeavouros yet it makes arch Linux easy to use. I don’t see why endevouros isn’t the better choice over manjaro.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I will hypothesize why:

    Bazzite is the Trendy Distro Of The Month, like Peppermint or Endeavor or Nobara or a frillion others. CachyOS is apparently next. Nearly constantly, you’ll hear about some trendy new distro which is a fork of Ubuntu or Fedora or Arch that has a feature or two targeted at newcomers or gamers, and for awhile it gets heavily recommended on Reddit or Lemmy, then you stop hearing about it forever as the rest of the ecosystem adopts that feature or fixes the thing that feature was meant to be worked around, and then the cycle repeats.

    Bazzite is targeted toward gamers, it emphasizes a solid onboarding experience with a configurator to choose/build your install media based on what you want to do with it, do you want a handheld or home theater experience or a keyboard and mouse desktop? Do you want it to boot to SteamOS or to a DE? Which DE? What hardware do you have? So their gimmick is to steer users through the initital config and setup process. Which as gimmicks go, that one is pretty solid.

    MEANWHILE

    Fedora’s Atomic editions have no gimmicks at all. You have to independently learn that immutable distros exist, independently decide you want that, and then go hunting on their website through their godforsaken marketing wank to find it.

    Fedora likes their bullshit branding. You go to their website, and there are big buttons for Fedora Workstation right next to Fedora KDE Plasma Desktop. “Workstation” does not mention that it’s just the Gnome version. You have to stroll further down, past server, IoT and “Core” versions, to a section that looks visually different labeled “More Fedora Options” including Atomic and Spins. You’re a new Linux user, you’ve just used the OS that came with your computer your whole life, explain to me what the difference between Core and Atomic is and why you should choose one over the other?

    The Atomic versions, which is kind of a synonym for “immutable”, you click on that, and you’re presented with five options: Fedora Silverblue, Fedora Kinoite, Fedora Sway Atomic, Fedora Budgie Atomic, and Fedora Cosmic Atomic Nowhere in its name or description does Silverblue mention that it’s the Gnome desktop one. Kinoite starts with a K and also mentions in the description it’s the KDE atomic version. Also, “kinoite” is a godawful word, they should have gone with Kyanite instead, which is a different blue crystal. Or they should have just called it KDE Atomic or Plasma Atomic. The others just put the DE’s name in the title LIKE A NORMAL PERSON, ROWAN.

    • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s a really dismissive way to say “It’s an OS built to fit a demand that wasn’t being met by the other distros”.

    • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I am wary about invoking Apple here, but say what you will about the company, there’s a lot of value in a braindead setup process. Many, many users just want something that just works - it was literally something I asked for when Linux was recommended to me (knowing some hate Ubuntu, I’ll out myself: using Ubuntu Budgie - setup was super simple. I guess there must be demand for that niche in the broader Linux community, so that’s a very smart move by Bazzite.

    • Default_Defect@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      CachyOS is apparently next.

      I’d argue that this is already the current trend. I can’t count the number of random Indian youtubers I recently got recommended to watch as they glaze CachyOS as the second coming of christ.

  • b34k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Just installed it at the start of the month on an older PC for a console-like experience in my living room. Only 2 issues really have me disappointed (and I’m not sure there’s much Bazzite can do about them)

    1. No HDMI 2.1 support from my AMD card (like seriously, wtf? Had I known that I probably would have dropped a 9060 XT in instead of a 9070XT)

    2. No real wake in controller support for my FlyDigi or Xbox Series controllers. I’ve messed around in udev and found no solutions.

    If they can figure those things out, I’d be much more impressed with the experience…. For now it just feels like another FOSS compromise to the product you actually want (PS5 Pro)

      • b34k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Unfortunately, my living room TV has only HDMI in, no DP. I tried the adaptor route, but it was horribly unstable… sometimes providing perfect signal, sometimes cutting to a black screen for a second or 2, every 5-10 seconds. Either way, VRR is wholly unsupported by the adaptor.

        • j0rge@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          lol you’re confusing me, bazzite isn’t immutable. Do you mean to say “Bazzite is growing for other reasons?”

          • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Wut? You’re responding to a trend graph for Fedora’s immutable (Atomic) forks.

            Built on Fedora’s rpm-ostree system, Bazzite uses an immutable design with atomic updates and rollback functionality.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bazzite_(operating_system)

            But yes, since the trend chart is showing immutable distros and how Bazzite is growing, I am saying the fact that Bazzite is immutable has nothing to do with it’s growth.

            Edit: Reading again, I realize you might not know that Fedora Atomic is the immutable base. 😉

            • j0rge@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 minutes ago

              The Bazzite team doesn’t control the wikipedia page, just the official documentation. Someone made up the term “immutable design”, that’s not a thing it’s just a container. There’s no need to confuse people just call it bazzite or a container. Atomic is a fedora brand name, it’s not a thing to classify things under.

              As you can see from the comments in the thread all this does is confuse people.

              Source: I work on bazzite

              • j0rge@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 minutes ago

                Bazzite contributor here, there’s no reason to care about this. This term just confuses people you can safely ignore it.

              • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                53 minutes ago

                Pretend your running a live OS off a read-only USB, yet any changes (app installs, config changes, etc) you make are saved to the HD. A new version of the OS comes out, so you write a new ISO to your USB, and upon booting it, all you changes are applied on top.

                This is a simplistic view of immutable distros, but thwy wrk more like snapshots. It allows for rollback. So you install v1, then v2 is a newer snapshot of the base OS, v3 is another, always building.

                The catch is they often require apps to run under things like flatpak so you don’t have to alter the OS packages. Personally, I’m not a fan for a daily driver, but it’s great for distros like Bazzite.

  • TyrantTW@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Surprised to see it at the bottom of the graph, but for anyone with a homelab uCore is a present from the heavens cloud!

  • mcv@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    My son also picked Bazzite, which I hadn’t heard of before. Unfortunately he didn’t like it and it back to Windows again.

      • przmk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I guess his son picked Bazzite for gaming. Linux Mint would not help with that since it’s lagging behind in updates to drivers (Mesa, etc)

        • mcv@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I did recommend Mint (although I use EndeavourOS myself), but he’s not interested anymore.

          It probably didn’t help that I recently recommended him to buy Nvidia rather than AMD for a recent upgrade, because Nvidia had lower power requirements, and I don’t his his PSU would have been able to handle the comparable AMD.

  • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bazzite just works when it’s a regular desktop. The HTPC (with steam game mode) one has a major issue that I don’t see them even addressing, it doesn’t suspend. It goes into a permanent black screen and the PC is still running. Nothing revives it beside a forced reboot. I reported it to their GitHub and got nothing really. I thought it was my hardware, but I had a friend of mine bring his whole tower to my house, we installed bazzite and it did the same thing. His tower has all new AMD hardware. On my laptop, bazzite is solid as hell. Works with zero issues.

      • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        And on the Asus devices. I’ve had this WiFi issue on bazzite on my onexplayer for months until a random developer fixed it by disabling the wifi driver on the device sleeps and re-enables it when it wakes up. The device is now flawless.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Go Bazzite, there has been a lot of talk about Bazzite lately, also on YouTube many have been reviewing it, like JayzTwoCents had a feature about it, which probably helped.
    I haven’t tried it myself, but it’s great to see that it’s still possible to shake up the Linux community with a new approach.
    Congratulations and best of wishes. 👍 🎈