cross-posted from: https://reddthat.com/post/48520958

More Sources.

While researching this news story I noticed that it was removed twice from Reddit by the mods with no clear reasons, so I added here some extra sources to make sure everything here is accurate.

I am not sure if the news story is being censored or if there is other reasons.

If you find any local articles or coverage that can add more context, please drop them in the comments and I will add them to the post.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Of course Swiss law matters. This article is on a Swiss website and reports on a Swiss trial.

      If you think someone convicted of rape is not necessarily a rapist, that’s on you.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree with everything up until the part where you accuse the authors of trying to get clicks. That is literally the purpose of a headline.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They don’t really read the article right, what has changed is not what rape is, but when a no is no. so it’s WHEN it’s rape, not WHAT is rape. The rule also goes for sexual assault.

      The law on rape was changed, but sexual assault is still not rape.

      Anyways, whether it’s the body or the headline that is right, the 2 parts remain at conflict on whether it’s sexual assault or rape.