• Ofiuco@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So I am completely ignorant about this, but… Would just hosting torrents to their own content work? I know the revenue might not be the same, but, would it be possible to keep it going around?

        • Jeffool @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          People with enough of a viewership would still be offered sponsorship for videos. Like YouTubers who do their own ads in videos.

        • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          When I worked with an influencer who made free workout vids, his entire revenue was 80% of income. It was an extreme minority from free videos to buying something in his store.

          Then some algorithm change in 2018 broke his entire income, he couldn’t afford me, and last I checked, he was sponsored by diet pills or whatever fake garbage.

          It’s a damn shame because his dream was always to provide free workout vids.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      So, there are options.

      You have three challenges:

      • You need to be discoverable

      • you need to be accessible

      • you need to monetize

      If you just make videos and torrent them, you’re not monetized, you’re not discoverable and you’re not really very accessable to the average person.

      Youtube is this nifty one-stop-shop that provides all three to a certain point.

      Peertube gives you some discoverability and lots of accessibility, but nothing for monetization.

      Odysee gives you a tiny bit of discoverability and lots of accessibility, but almost nothing for monetization.

      Floatplane (assuming GN wasn’t feuding with LMG) gives you reasonable monetization and accessibility but almost nothing in discoverability.

      edit: cut myself short

      I’d like to see some form of partially federated system that works with peertube. I think the platform could scale and we could give youtube a run for their money.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Surely torrent distributed video can still have sponsorships in it, stick it up as a video on your own website is an option too. Could even go for low res video on website (cheap to host) along with an option of HD torrent.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          https://socialblade.com/youtube/handle/gamersnexus

          He gets around 750 Million Youtube verified views per month , he’s releasing about 5 hours of content per month.

          He’s not self-hosting that cheaply.

          His sponsors are giving him the a nice pile of money based on his view count, he’s not going to manage that on his own without the algo pumping users to him. Search engines kind of suck and video bloggers at that scale need organics to keep going.

          You can’t add monetization without discoverability and accessibility.

          Looking at those numbers, I don’t even know that peertube could handle it, he’d probably need to setup his own cluster to mirror them all.

          There’s a reason why we don’t have a lot of competition to YouTube.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Theoretically, you could try to rely on patreon to have your audience pay you directly, but without discoverability, they will slowly dwindle and die. As to corporate sponsors, no one is going to pay for ads on torrented shows.

      • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Did they hurt your feel feels? Should they have taken it easy on those multi million dollar companies shitty business practices? Don’t worry corpo-chan, those companies totally see you and plan an rewarding your loyalty. Lol

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeh, absolutely.
      The DMCA takedown works because music/film industry execs have previously gone after YouTube for not responding to legitimate copyright infringements.
      So YouTube now favours the person claiming the strike and makes it very difficult for the defendant to exonerate themselves.

      Changing how they publish will sidestep YouTube overplaying.
      But YouTube has revenue split with content creators, and has an absolutely massive audience with discovery algorithms and community stuff. Moving away from that platform would be an insane move

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Sounds like YouTubers should go after YouTube when this happens. Maybe a class action lawsuit for lost revenue?

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 hours ago

          There is no good answer to it.

          It is ridiculous that a channel which uploads thousands of authentic original content can lose all algorithm momentum from a frivolous DMCA strike removing their video for 10 days.
          It basically guarantees a video gets killed. Even if the video gets reinstated after an appeal.

          This particular video will massively bounce back. People are angry at Nvidia, people are angry with YouTube and with YouTubes DMCA process, and now people are angry at Bloomberg.
          And Gamers Nexus isn’t gonna let this drop, and GN has earned its communities trust (and I think trust in general) that there will be flocks of people ensuring the video doesn’t die.

          But if this was a smaller channel releasing a massive expose like this, it would probably just drop out off the public’s radar before it gets established

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Messy. Youtube could just refuse to serve his videos because they decide they don’t want to :/

          They have more lawyers than God, I can’t help but think the contract they all have with Google favors Google to the extreme.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Nobody is gonna watch a torrent tuber, the audience would get cut to 1/100th if even that.

      Too many people rely on the aggregates and the algorithms.