Good point, but on the other hand, the sketch doesn’t include arms, so I think the argument that he’s just bad at art could probably be pretty convincing. Plenty of other evidence that he’s a pedophile.
If you’re bad at art, it’s much easier to draw big boobs than small ones. Big boobs are just circles. People learn to draw circles as toddlers. Whether or not he’s a good artist, he made a deliberate artistic choice, in both the size and placement of those breasts.
Like I said, we have enough evidence for any reasonable jury to convict him already. Connecting in ambiguous or easily-explained-away evidence just weakens the case.
Good point, but on the other hand, the sketch doesn’t include arms, so I think the argument that he’s just bad at art could probably be pretty convincing. Plenty of other evidence that he’s a pedophile.
If you’re bad at art, it’s much easier to draw big boobs than small ones. Big boobs are just circles. People learn to draw circles as toddlers. Whether or not he’s a good artist, he made a deliberate artistic choice, in both the size and placement of those breasts.
People learn to draw arms as toddlers, too.
Like I said, we have enough evidence for any reasonable jury to convict him already. Connecting in ambiguous or easily-explained-away evidence just weakens the case.