• oasis@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Pretty sure vantablack was patented not copyrighted. It’s also possible that is wasn’t either and just was really hard to produce. Afaik vantablack isn’t really designed to be be painted and requires quite specialised equipment.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They sell it as a paint, however : “Controversy arose when Surrey Nanosystems granted Anish Kapoor exclusive rights to use Vantablack in artistic applications. Many artists voiced opposition to his monopoly over the substance.”

      • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Thats the beef. If you try to get or use it, Amish Kapoor will typically take legal action.

        Also, hes never really made any compelling art with it either.

        He’s the guy who made that big silver sculpture in Chicago. He intensely dislikes that everyone calls it The Bean because he named it Cloud Gate. Really, he made a giant sculpture in a public place that is shaped like a massive shiny kidney bean and is big mad that people call it a bean. Seems like hes kind of a thin skinned baby.

        • oasis@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          If I remember correctly the company that gave him permission to use vantablack never gave him the ownership of it.

          So presumably Amish couldn’t do anything personally about it.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            This is drama from a decade ago so don’t take it as gospel: Iirc, the contract Kapoor signed with Surrey gave him the right to enforce the patent when used in art or aesthetic design applications. I can’t remember if he sues as an involved party on behalf of Surrey or if he somehow has the right to sue directly, but the effect is the same. Basically Surrey didn’t want to deal with enforicng it, and signed over that as part of the exclusivity deal.