• Feydaikin@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1か月前

    Yup, but an attack on Greenland (for an example) is an attack on the Kingdom of Denmark. And thus is treated as such.

    Basically, Greenland gets to run itself, for the most part. But anything external goes through DK.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1か月前

      It could be treated as such. It could also not be. They don’t have the legal framework that membership provides.

      • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1か月前

        They are part of Denmark and therefor goes under it’s protection.

        If they didn’t, Greenland would have been pick off a long time ago.

        • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1か月前

          Under Denmark’s protection (whatever that is worth) yes, but is, for example, Bulgaria going to militarily support a non-member independent nation? Maybe. They’re not obligated to.

          • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1か月前

            As I said, by proxy Greenland is also under NATO protection as long they are part of Denmark.