• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    These comments are severely overestimating the level of autonomy players are given in this game. It’s just a branching story, where the branches one player is presented with are dependent on the branch another player chose. I imagine if only a single person plays this game, it will just make stuff up to make it seem like there are other players affecting the world.

    Also, also the cynicism on Lemmy is a stale meta at this point. Be the change you wanna see or stfu.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think this is why a certain scrolling shooter at the endgame of a certain game closely located to a tomato didn’t emotionally work for me. I can do the math - it can’t just throw that many other players at the problem to get me through the enemy ships, and the game needed to be playable off the internet since little else of it was online.

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Be the change you wanna see or stfu.

      I am, by not supporting these games financially, I’m hoping they crash and aren’t made anymore.

      Live Service single player games are an abomination.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        How are you defining “live service single player” game? This is a narrative adventure game. I will be surprised if you ever actually interact with another player directly at all. The dev has said that it supports completely offline play.

        Edit: the devs have also specifically said you won’t interact with other players in real time. It’s about as “multiplayer” as the bloodstains in dark souls, but if they had a bigger effect on your narrative.