blibla@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agospeak for yourselfslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down110file-text
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1external-linkspeak for yourselfslrpnk.netblibla@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square85fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 hours agoWe are closer to making horny chatbots than a superintelligence figuring out a cure for cancer. Actually, if the latter wins, would that super AI win a Nobel prize?
minus-squarepercent@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 hours agoIt would probably go to whoever uses it to find the cure… And to none of the authors who wrote the data that it was trained on
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoThat’s how the Nobel prize always works. The price goes to whoever managed to cross the finishing line, not all the thousands of scientists before who conducted preliminary research.
minus-squareREDACTED@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoTo be fair, a better pattern finder could indeed lead to better ways of curing cancer.
We are closer to making horny chatbots than a superintelligence figuring out a cure for cancer.
Actually, if the latter wins, would that super AI win a Nobel prize?
It would probably go to whoever uses it to find the cure… And to none of the authors who wrote the data that it was trained on
That’s how the Nobel prize always works. The price goes to whoever managed to cross the finishing line, not all the thousands of scientists before who conducted preliminary research.
To be fair, a better pattern finder could indeed lead to better ways of curing cancer.