• ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That’s crazy, I am also better at handling radioactive material than Marie Curie. It’s because she’s dead and I’m not.

  • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There’s a Sean Carrol video somewhere talking about how the average graduate student in physics understands Relativity far better than Einstein did, and it’s because lots of people with lots of different specialties and insights have thought really long and hard about it and come up with deeper, more elegant ways to describe it.

  • Klear@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    There is a wonderful book by Johannes Kepler about snowflakes. It’s a great read, because he’s one of the all-time greats and his thinking is fascinating and insightful and wrong at just about every turn, but he’s doing his best. Though knowing what we know now he never even stood a chance. I mean, the guy didn’t know that water and ice are the same thing.

    Highly recommended.

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 hours ago

      He didn’t know about molecules so… There was no language for him to differentiate between matter and states of matter.

    • eRac@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I mean, the guy didn’t know that water and ice are the same thing.

      The summaries I find reference him theorizing that water may be spherical, leading to the hexagon pattern. He also related the feathery ends to steam hitting a cold window.

      It seems to me that he knew that steam, water, and ice were the same thing.

      • Klear@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Well, you’d be wrong. He thought they were different substances, one turning into another.

        I really recommend finding the book and reading it. It’s short and fairly easy to read. IIRC it was written as a Christmas present for someone, not as a super serious scientific treatise.

    • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I mean, the guy didn’t know that water and ice are the same thing.

      What was his logic here? I still believe that but I’m curious to hear a scientific reason why.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s complicated. I know that Newton’s model of light as a particle was wrong. If I had a time traveling Newton in front of me, could I explain all the experiments in between him and Einstein about light that get us knocking on the door of Quantum Physics? More importantly, could I show it well enough to satisfy the level of evidence he would need (even ignoring his giant ego)?

    Probably not. Maybe if I had months to prepare.

    • wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Newton believed in god, so there obviously were things he accepted with practically no evidence whatsoever 🙊

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      12 hours ago

      He was quoting (allegedly) Bernard of Chartres, thereby standing on his shoulders, interestingly.

        • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I try to bear Old Isaac in mind when I meet arrogant and unpleasant but intelligent teens.

          It’s very easy as an adult to be very annoyed by them, short with them, and/or to feel an obligation in some way to “socialize them better”

          But you don’t know which of them have an insight in their brain that unlocks the proverbial Warp Drive. Zefram Cochrane

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That’s the trick. None of them have all of the pieces. We’re a social species. All of our efforts are collective. We use our combined brainpower to make these breakthroughs.

            The first person crossing the line gets all the credit, because our society is obsessed with credit and patents. And then it freezes the advancements for the length of exclusivity, until we can all finally start working on it together again. It’s stupid and inefficient. We need to stop teaching these individualism myths.

          • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            “By the time I was your age I’d saved enough money to move into an apartment with no room mates, and I had enough money left over to buy a car.”

  • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I wish I had been born into the era of science where I’m smart enough to discover things. I can’t code. I can’t do calculus. I would have thrived in the 19th century where I could invent washing my hands and be considered a world-class doctor.