LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agoI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square477linkfedilinkarrow-up1807arrow-down180
arrow-up1727arrow-down1imageI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square477linkfedilink
minus-squareTheRedSpade@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·3 months agoHow can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
minus-squareVoroxpete@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·3 months agoThey didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case. But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.
How can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
They didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case.
But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.