• I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ok, that’s an excellent sentiment, but utterly worthless in the real world. People will buy what is available and what is cheap. A handful of people choosing to be conscious with what they purchase is a drop in the bucket compared to what the masses will do.

    I get it. Convincing the people to not buy stuff that pollutes should be the easy route, but it’s not. And unfortunately we don’t live in the world of “it should be this way”, we live in reality. And in reality, the only real way to stop pollution heavy products from being sold is to go after the companies making them directly. Boycotts alone will not work because, again, as long as the products are available and cheap, people will buy them; morals be damned.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not always. I’ve always tried to buy what is better for the planet, even if that costs a bit more. Or will repair stuff instead of toss and buy.

      There are dozens of us 😀

      • leagman1@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        Ye, but you gotta look at it at scale. BP can crash ansingle tanker and pollute for the ewuivalent of 10 generations of your family (all branches). This type of scale of pollution needs to be addressed by governments via policies and their enforcement.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Totally agree on that. But I will also carry out my shopping in a cloth bag i brought into tue store instead of plastic at the till.

          The more things are unwanted, the less oil derivatives that get made, which reduces profits. Not enough to dissaude big oil, but better than funding them and spin off industries

          • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            In a (sadly) hilarious twist of fate, the vast majority of the cloth shopping bags still use petroleum products like polyester or nylon.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yeah, we have cotton and what appears to be felt, but I presume it is an artificial felt. But they are strong and won’t make it to the landfill for decades

              • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                That’s good. Some of the “reusable” bags I see for sale are practically disposable. It’s ridiculous.

                • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Yes, I know the kind you mean. The felt looking ones they started selling here are very strong. Full bag of grocery’s plus 5lb bag of onions and 10lbs of potatoes in it, where its almost too heavy to carry and the bag and handles hold up

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      Unfortunately, convincing corporations to not pollute isn’t any easier. Using the tools of government to regulate them even harder still. It all comes down to people and what they want. Try to circumvent them and they’ll fight back.

      Just look at what’s happening right now. Trump is rolling back tons of environmental and agricultural (anti- animal cruelty) regulations all the time. What activists had counted as previous wins are now going away.

            • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              You can’t enact government reforms without winning an election, and to do that you need to convince individual voters. But then if you enact your reforms without a strong mandate, those reforms will be gone next election.

              Anyway, that book is about nudge theory which is NOT what I’m arguing for. I already knew that bit of pop psychology was BS years ago.